Skip to content

Post-surgical Functional Results in Patients With Epiretinal Membrane Undergoing Controlled Macular Detachment

Post-surgical Functional Results in Patients With Epiretinal Membrane Undergoing Controlled Macular Detachment: Pilot Study.

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07095907
Acronym
DMER25
Enrollment
36
Registered
2025-07-31
Start date
2025-06-10
Completion date
2026-01-26
Last updated
2025-07-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epiretinal Membrane Surgery

Keywords

Epiretinal membrane, Epiretinal membrane surgery, Macular detachment

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate postsurgical functional changes in patients with advanced epiretinal membrane (ERM) (stages 3 and 4) by integrating a controlled macular detachment with a balanced salt solution to the conventional ERM peeling technique.

Detailed description

The evolution of visual acuity will be analyzed using the ETDRS letter scale. At the same time, anatomical and microvascular changes will be evaluated using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) to evaluate their impact on visual recovery. This technique is expected to minimize persistent distortion, promote restoration of retinal perfusion, mitigate postoperative ischemia, and improve macular structural stability, potentially leading to more significant functional recovery. It is designed as a prospective longitudinal pilot study; The research will be carried out in the Retina Department of the Association to Prevent Blindness in Mexico (APEC), focusing on patients over 18 years of age with a diagnosis of advanced MRD and eligible for vitreoretinal surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREPars plana vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane peeling and controlled macular detachment

Currently, vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane peeling is the standard procedure; however, its ability to improve visual acuity in these patients remains limited. In this context, controlled macular detachment is emerging as a surgical alternative that could optimize the anatomical and functional restoration of the retina.

Sponsors

Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective, Longitudinal, Experimental, Descriptive Cohort Study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients over 18 years of age. * Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ERM grade III or IV by Optical Coherence Tomography who present visual disturbances such as metamorphopsia or visual impairment (measured in letters on the ETDRS scale) but who do not reflect end-stage visual impairment. * Patients suitable for vitreoretinal surgical procedures, with no uncontrolled medical comorbidities that contraindicate surgery. * Patients who understand the objectives and risks of the study and sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of grade III or IV ERM by Optical Coherence Tomography who do not have the ability to improve their visual acuity. * Patients diagnosed with ocular pathologies that significantly affect their visual acuity, such as moderate or advanced glaucoma, non-glaucomatous optic neuropathies, or optic media opacities such as leukomas, significant corneal edema, or other maculopathies such as macular atrophy or macular ischemia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BCVA (Best corrected visual acuity)From the first recruitment evaluation to the last one at 3 months post-surgeryAbility to discriminate fine details at a standard distance, assessed by reading letters on an ETDRS chart.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative anatomical changes of the macula using optical coherence tomography: Central macular thickness (µm)From enrollment to the end of follow-up at the third month.Central macular thickness measured in microns (µm)
Postoperative anatomical changes of the macula using optical coherence tomography: Inner nuclear layer thickness (µm)From enrollment to the end of follow-up at the third month.Inner nuclear layer thickness measured in microns (µm)
Postoperative anatomical changes of the macula using optical coherence tomography: Ellipsoid zone disruptionFrom enrollment to the end of follow-up at the third month.Presence or absence of disruption of the Ellipsoid layer

Countries

Mexico

Contacts

Primary ContactRaúl Velez Montoya, MD
rvelezmx@yahoo.com(52) 55 5436 7335
Backup ContactOriana Gomez Erazo, MD
orianagomezerazo@gmail.com57 3205605466

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026