Skip to content

Endoscopic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement Versus Conventional Approach in the Treatment of Early Phase Acute Pancreatitis

Endoscopic Pancreatic Duct Stent Placement Versus Conventional Approach in the Treatment of Early Phase Acute Pancreatitis: International Multicenter Controlled Randomized Prospective Study Protocol

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07093996
Enrollment
200
Registered
2025-07-30
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2027-02-01
Last updated
2025-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pancreatitis (AP)

Keywords

acute pancreatitis, endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement, pancreatic necrosis

Brief summary

The planned multicenter randomized study is aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting in adult patients with acute pancreatitis. It is planned to include patients with early-stage nonbiliary pancreatitis in the study.

Detailed description

Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement is used to treat a variety of pancreatic diseases, including chronic pancreatitis, Wirsung duct strictures, pseudocysts in disconnected duct syndrome and as a preventive measure after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Despite the obvious progress, the greatest number of unsolved problems remain in the issues of using this manipulation in patients with acute pancreatitis. In particular, the perspectives of the pancreatic duct stent placement in treatment of acute pancreatitis early stages remain controversial. On the one hand, the installation of a stent in the early acute pancreatitis stages helps to normalize the outflow of pancreatic juice from the pancreas and reduce intraductal pressure, leading to a beneficial effect, as evidenced by a number of researchers. On the other hand, stent placement may partially block the second-order pancreatic ducts or increase the risk of sterile pancreatitis contamination due to the development of reflux. In addition, one should not forget about a number of post-manipulation complications inherent in this procedure, including bleeding from the area of the major duodenal papilla, perforation of the duodenum, progression of pancreatic necrosis and cholangitis. Finally, the timing and indications for early endoscopic stenting of the pancreatic duct are not currently standardized, largely due to the fact that acute pancreatitis is a pathological condition that is difficult to predict. Thus, although this manipulation seems perspective, due to the lack of evidence base, it is currently difficult to recommend it for use in wide clinical practice. The planned multicenter randomized study is aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting in adult patients with acute pancreatitis. It is planned to include patients with early-stage nonbiliary pancreatitis in the study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEndoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement

Endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement will be performed with a 5Fr Boston Scientific pancreatic stent (3-4 cm in length) within 24 hours from the randomization procedure. The stent will be removed on the 5th day after installation.

DRUGConventional treatment of acute pancreatitis in early phase

Infusion therapy, pain relief, nutritional support and surgical procedure if needed

Sponsors

Almazov National Medical Research Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial Masking: not provided (open allocation). Given the specific nature of the medical discipline being studied, blinding of participants, as well as allocation concealment, is not planned due to the practical impossibility of this procedures. Randomization method: calendar, according to which patients born in an even year will be distributed into the study group, and those born in an odd year - into the comparison group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis confirmed on the basis of at least 2 of the 3 diagnostic criteria according to the revised Atlanta classification 2. Presence of organ failure signs (moderate and severe pancreatitis) 3. Informed consent of the patient

Exclusion criteria

1. Presence of other indications for endoscopic intervention on the major duodenal papilla (biliary pancreatitis with cholangitis, calculus of the major duodenal papilla, stenosis of the major duodenal papilla, etc.) 2. Previous surgical interventions on the major duodenal papilla 3. Diverticula of the major duodenal papilla 4. Pregnancy 5. Shock 6. Coagulopathy (INR\>1.5, blood platelets \< 50\*109/l

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mortality rateFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 monthsData will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of different pancreatic necrosis modelsFrom enrollment to the 7th day of treatmentWill be evaluated according CT-imaging: Model 1 - volume of pancreatic necrosis \< 30%, or not determined Model 2 - volume of pancreatic necrosis 30-50%, located in the distal pancreatic part Model 3 - volume of pancreatic necrosis 30-50% located in the proximal part Model 4 - volume of pancreatic necrosis 30-50% and more with separation of viable proximal and distal parts (disconnected duct syndrome) Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages
Average Balthazar computed tomography severity index (0-10)From enrollment to the 7th day of treatmentA scoring system used to assess the severity of acute pancreatitis based on computed tomography scans. Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of mean.
Average SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score) score (0-24)From enrollment to the 7th day of treatmentSequential Organ Failure Assessment Score. Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of mean
Incidence of complications associated with endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placementFrom endoscopic pancreatic duct stent placement to 3 monthsFrequency of duodenal bleeding, duodenal perforation, unsuccessful major duodenal papilla canulation etc. Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages
Number of participants with other surgical interventionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 monthsNumber of other surgical interventions, such as abdominal drainage, retroperitoneal drainage, lumbotomy, laparotomy
Length of hospital stayFrom date of hospitalization until the date of discharge, assessed up to 3 monthsData will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of length of hospital stay in days
Number of participants with manifestation of diabetes mellitusFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 monthsData will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages
Incidence of other surgical interventionsFrom enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 monthsFrequency of other surgical interventions, such as abdominal drainage, retroperitoneal drainage, lumbotomy, laparotomy. Data will be tabulated and statistically analyzed in terms of percentages

Countries

China, Russia

Contacts

Primary ContactPavel A Kotkov, MD
Kotkovdr@mail.ru89062619231
Backup ContactBadri V Sigua, PhD
dr.sigua@gmail.com89111979343

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026