Skip to content

A Study Comparing Immediate Treatment to Deferred Treatment With the Fisher Wallace (FW) Stimulator FW-200 Device for the Treatment of Self-reported Anxiety in First Responders

A Randomized Waitlist-controlled Trial to Evaluate of the Effectiveness of Immediate Treatment Compared to Deferred Treatment With the Fisher Wallace Stimulator FW-200 Device in First Responders With Self-reported Anxiety

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07093736
Enrollment
220
Registered
2025-07-30
Start date
2021-07-06
Completion date
2023-05-11
Last updated
2025-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anxiety

Keywords

self-reported anxiety, first responder

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the Fisher Wallace Stimulator FW-200 experimental device is effective at treating self-reported anxiety in first responders. The main question the trial aims to answer is does the FW-200 device improve anxiety as measured by a validated questionnaire.

Detailed description

This is a randomized waitlist-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Fisher Wallace Stimulator FW-200 device in the treatment of self-reported anxiety in police personnel and first responders. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive immediate treatment or deferred treatment with the FW-200 device.

Interventions

DEVICEFW-200

Non-invasive, home-use neurostimulation device delivering transcranial fixed output, alternating current stimulation

Sponsors

Advarra
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Florence Healthcare
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fisher Wallace Laboratories
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study was a waitlist-controlled study where the subjects were randomly assigned to receive an intervention immediately or after a specified delay. The two-week delay was designed to measure the natural progression of anxiety symptoms over a short period without intervention and to establish a baseline for how rapidly symptoms may escalate or impair functioning.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years and older * Ability to read and write in English * First responder employee or employee of participating police department * Beck Anxiety Inventory total score above 7 * Able to commit to two 20-minute device treatment session per day for up to 8 weeks * Willing to wear an actigraphy device

Exclusion criteria

* Use of brain stimulation device in the last year * Have a pacemaker, electronic stent or electronic implants * Started or planning to start new medial treatment or health program over the next 8 weeks * Contemplated suicide in the past year * Institutionalized for mental health issues * Have a serious medical condition * Currently taking medications affecting the nervous system * Allergic to nickel * Currently taking or planning to take part in any other study on insomnia, anxiety or other mental health effort over the next 8 weeks * Currently pregnant or planning to become pregnant in the next 10 weeks

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scoresFrom baseline to week 2Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores at Week 2 versus baseline in immediate treatment group compared to the deferred treatment group. Total score range is a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 63. Higher score means a worse severity of anxiety.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Health QuestionnaireFrom baseline to week 2 and week 4. Total scores range from 0 to 24. Higher scores mean worse severity of depressive symptoms.Change in Patient Health Questionnaire-8
Professional Quality of LifeFrom baseline to week 2 and week 4Change in Professional Quality of Life
Consenting to Study ContinuationWeek 4Percentage of participants consenting to study continuation at week 4 in the immediate treatment group compared to deferred treatment group
Total Sleep TimeBaseline to through study completionPercentage of participants with a 20 minute or more increase in total sleep time for the immediate treatment group compared to the deferred treatment group.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026