Skip to content

SNM vs. HBOT for Refractory IC/BPS

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sacral Neuromodulation Versus Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Refractory Interstitial Cystitis and Bladder Pain Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07091266
Enrollment
88
Registered
2025-07-29
Start date
2021-02-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome, Underactive Bladder

Brief summary

This study is for people with long-term bladder pain and urinary problems (known as Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome or IC/BPS) that have not improved with other treatments. The study compares two different treatments: Sacral Neuromodulation (SNM), which uses an implanted device to send gentle electrical pulses to nerves controlling the bladder, and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT), where patients breathe pure oxygen in a special chamber. Participants were randomly assigned to one of the two groups to help doctors understand which treatment works better to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life.

Detailed description

Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is a chronic, debilitating condition that is often refractory to conventional treatments. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is a third-line therapy recognized by AUA/EAU guidelines, while hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is an emerging treatment with potential anti-inflammatory benefits. There is a lack of direct comparative evidence between these two modalities. This study prospectively enrolled and randomized 88 patients with refractory IC/BPS to receive either SNM (study group) or HBOT (control group). The primary objective is to compare changes in urinary symptoms, urodynamic parameters, and quality of life scores between the two groups at baseline, 1-month, and 3-month follow-ups. The study aims to provide robust evidence to guide treatment selection for refractory IC/BPS patients who have failed at least two prior therapies.

Interventions

DEVICESacral Neuromodulation (SNM)

A standardized two-stage implantation protocol was used. In Stage 1, a temporary lead (InterStim 3093, Medtronic) was implanted at the S3 sacral foramen under fluoroscopic guidance. Patients with ≥50% improvement in urinary symptoms over a 7-day test period proceeded to Stage 2, where a permanent neurostimulator (InterStim 3058, Medtronic) was implanted subcutaneously. Stimulation parameters were adjusted (amplitude: 0.5-10 V; frequency: 14 Hz; pulse width: 210 μs) to optimize symptom control.

Patients received two 20-session courses (5 sessions/week) in a hyperbaric chamber at 2.0 atmospheres absolute (ATA). Each session consisted of 60 minutes of 100% oxygen inhalation, bracketed by compression and decompression periods.

Sponsors

Shiyan City Renmin Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 years or older. * Diagnosis of refractory Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS) according to AUA/SUFU guidelines, confirmed by cystoscopy with hydrodistention and glomerulations, and/or Hunner's lesions. * Failure of at least two prior therapies (e.g., oral medications, intravesical instillations, pelvic floor physical therapy). * Willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of urinary tract malignancies, pelvic organ prolapse ≥ stage III, or urethral stricture. * Low-compliance bladder (\<10 mL/cm H₂O), organic bladder outlet obstruction, or active urinary tract infection. * Contraindications to surgery (e.g., coagulopathy, existing pacemaker) or HBOT (e.g., untreated pneumothorax). * Pregnancy. * Presence of psychiatric disorders or inability to comply with follow-up protocols.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Daily Urination FrequencyBaseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured by a 3-day bladder diary as the average number of voids per 24 hours. A lower value indicates better outcome.
Change in Nocturia FrequencyBaseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured by a 3-day bladder diary as the average number of nighttime voids. A lower value indicates better outcome.
Change from Baseline in Quality of Life Score at 3 MonthsBaseline, 3 MonthsMeasured using the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire-Short Form (ICI-Q-SF). A lower score indicates better quality of life.
Change in Pain SeverityBaseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure (MUCP)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured via urodynamic studies to assess urethral sphincter function. Unit: centimeters of water (cm H₂O).
Change in Post-void Residual (PVR) VolumeBaseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured by ultrasound in milliliters (mL).
Incidence of Adverse EventsUp to 3 monthsNumber of participants experiencing adverse events, such as pain at the implantation site, symptom recurrence, electrode displacement, urinary tract infection, dizziness, or vomiting.
Change in Abdominal Leak Point Pressure (ALPP)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured via urodynamic studies as the intravesical pressure at which urine leakage occurs during a cough or strain. Unit: centimeters of water (cm H₂O).
Change in Maximum Voided Volume (MVV)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured by a 3-day bladder diary in milliliters (mL).
Change in Average Voided Volume (AVV)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured by a 3-day bladder diary in milliliters (mL).
Change in Bladder Compliance (BC)Baseline, 1 Month, 3 MonthsMeasured via urodynamic studies as the change in bladder volume per unit change in pressure. Unit: milliliters per centimeter of water (mL/cm H₂O).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026