Skip to content

Impact of Anesthesia Alarm Volume on Mental Workload in Surgical Trainees

Impact of Anesthesia Alarm Volume on Mental Workload in Surgical Trainees: A Randomized Pilot Simulation Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07089485
Acronym
ASLEC02
Enrollment
26
Registered
2025-07-28
Start date
2026-03-10
Completion date
2027-01-09
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Disorder, Mental Workload, Noise, Surgical Procedures

Keywords

Noise/adverse effects, Cognition Disorders, Surgical procedures

Brief summary

Noise in hospital environments, particularly in operating rooms, poses challenges to both patient comfort and healthcare professionals' performance. Among the sources of noise, anesthesia monitoring alarms are essential for patient safety, yet no clear guidelines exist regarding their optimal sound level. Excessive alarm volume may increase distraction and cognitive load, especially for surgical trainees, potentially impairing their focus and performance during procedures. This randomized pilot interventional study aims to evaluate the impact of anesthesia alarm sound intensity on the mental workload of surgical trainees performing simulated surgeries. Participants will be randomly assigned to conditions with either an optimized alarm volume or a higher standard volume during simulated tasks. Cognitive load will be assessed using objective physiological measures such as heart rate variability and pupillometry, as well as subjective evaluations with tools like the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX scales. The primary goal is to determine whether an optimized alarm sound level can reduce cognitive strain without compromising vigilance required for patient safety. Findings from this study are expected to provide evidence-based recommendations for auditory ergonomics in operating rooms, ultimately improving working conditions for surgical teams and enhancing both training and patient safety.

Detailed description

Noise pollution in hospital environments, particularly within operating rooms (ORs), is a growing concern. It can impact not only the comfort and well-being of patients but also the cognitive performance and concentration of healthcare professionals. Among the various sources of noise, auditory alarms used in anesthesia monitoring are critical for patient safety. However, despite their importance, there are currently no established guidelines or regulations defining the optimal volume at which these alarms should be set. Previous studies have examined the effects of background noise and music on surgical performance, with some showing that certain types of music can reduce stress or improve focus. However, the specific impact of anesthesia alarm sounds especially when they are excessively loud or frequent remains poorly understood. These alarms may distract surgical teams, particularly trainees, and contribute to increased cognitive load, potentially impairing performance during surgical procedures. Cognitive load refers to the amount of mental effort being used in working memory. In the operating room, excessive cognitive load can hinder performance, decision-making, and reaction time, particularly in complex or high-pressure situations. Understanding how to manage and optimize environmental factors that influence mental workload is therefore essential, especially for surgical trainees still developing their skills. This randomized pilot interventional study aims to investigate the effect of anesthesia alarm sound intensity on the mental workload of novice surgeons performing simulated procedures. By focusing on surgical trainees working on a high-fidelity simulator, we aim to create a controlled yet realistic environment to assess the cognitive impact of varying alarm volumes. The study will compare two conditions: an optimized alarm sound level and a higher-level alarm sound (above ambient noise). Participants will be randomly assigned to one of these conditions during their simulated surgical tasks. The primary outcome is the cognitive load experienced by the trainees under each condition. To comprehensively assess cognitive load, both objective and subjective tools will be used. Objective measures will include heart rate variability (HRV) and pupillometry two physiological indicators of stress and cognitive effort. Subjective cognitive load will be measured using validated scales such as the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) or its surgical adaptation, the SURG-TLX. These tools evaluate dimensions such as mental demand, effort, frustration, and performance. By combining physiological data with subjective reports, the study seeks to capture a multidimensional understanding of how alarm noise affects surgical trainees. The ultimate goal is to determine whether reducing the intensity of auditory alarms while maintaining their effectiveness can minimize unnecessary cognitive strain and distraction during procedures. The findings of this study are expected to inform future recommendations regarding auditory ergonomics in operating rooms. Establishing evidence-based guidelines for alarm sound levels could contribute to a safer, less stressful working environment for surgical teams. This is particularly important in the training context, where the balance between realism and cognitive manageability is crucial for learning and performance. In conclusion, this pilot study addresses a critical and underexplored aspect of the surgical environment: the cognitive impact of anesthesia alarm noise. By evaluating its effects on novice surgeons, the research aims to promote better alarm management strategies, improve working conditions, and ultimately enhance both patient safety and surgical education.

Interventions

OTHEReffects of sound

The surgical trainees will perform four 15-minute surgical sequences in a controlled environment, with varying sound levels (64, 67, 73, and 75 dB(A)) randomized across the sequences to assess the surgeons' responses.

Sponsors

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This prospective interventional study will evaluate the impact of different noise levels in the operating room on surgeons' performance in simulation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Surgical residents or experienced surgeons; * Surgeons with normal hearing; * Surgeons capable of performing surgical sutures (regardless of skill level); * Surgeons able and willing to follow all study procedures according to the protocol; * Surgeons who have understood, signed, and dated the informed consent form provided on the day of enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

* Surgeons undergoing beta-blocker treatment; * Surgeons with known cardiac pathology; * Surgeons who do not consent to participate in the study; * Surgeons with known hearing problems; * Surgeons who fail the hearing test; * Surgeons who worked on-call or night shifts during the night before the evaluation day. * Surgical trainees at the Lorraine Cancer Institute. * Adults under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or legal supervision);Persons deprived of liberty;Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Impact of the optimal sound intensity level during a surgical procedureFrom inclusion (baseline) to 6 months post-inclusionAssessment of heart and respiratory rate variability parameters

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Interference with the surgical procedureFrom inclusion (baseline) until the end of the surgical procedureMeasurement using the SURG-TLX (Surgical Task Load Index) questionnaire
Mental workload of the surgical traineeFrom inclusion (baseline) until the end of the surgical procedureMeasurement using the SURG-TLX scale.

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFrédéric MARCHAL, Pr.

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

STUDY_CHAIRNour Mammari Halabi, PhD.

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026