Skip to content

HoYAG vs TFL in miniPCNL With ClearPetra

Holmium:YAG Laser With MOSES Technology vs Thulium Fiber Laser in Supine Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy With Vacuum-assisted Renal Access Sheath: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07087977
Enrollment
150
Registered
2025-07-28
Start date
2025-08-22
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Stone, Nephrolithiasis

Keywords

Nephrolithiasis, Kidney Stone, ClearPetra, HoYAG, TFL

Brief summary

Mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy is the treatment of choice for kidney stones over 2cm. This procedure commonly uses laser energy for breaking the stones, and among possible laser platforms, Hoyag and thulium fiber laser are FDA approved. Recently, this procedure has also included the use of vacuum assisted renal access sheaths, which allows suction to be employed together with the breaking of stones. This study intends to compare outcomes when using either laser platforms with suction sheaths in participants undergoing mini percutaneous nephrolithotripsy for the treatment of kidney stones.

Detailed description

Due to the reduced diameter sheath of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (miniPCNL), surgical outcomes commonly rely on stone fragmentation provided by a laser energy source. Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser (HoYAG) has long been considered the gold-standard for lithotripsy, but this position has been challenged by the introduction of the thulium fiber laser (TFL) since its approval for clinical use in 2017. In the same manner, the recently developed ClearPetra™(MicroTech Endoscopy®, China) vacuum-assisted renal access sheath (VA-RAS) is a novel technology that allows for concomitant irrigation and suction during the procedure. No prior studies to date have exclusively investigated mini-PCNL outcomes with Ho:YAG and TFL when using VA-RAS. This study addresses the literature paucity regarding the outcomes when utilizing the high-power Ho:YAG with MOSES technology vs. TFL in mini-PCNL with VA-RAS. This study hypothesizes that the Ho:YAG may provide more efficient stone clearance, secondary to its superior ability to fragment stones when compared to the TLF laser, which primarily dusts despite the laser settings utilized.

Interventions

DEVICEHoYAG laser

Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG laser or TFL laser group for miniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.

DEVICETFL laser platform

Patients will be randomly assigned (1:1) to HoYAG or TFL laser group for MiniPCNL surgery according to standard of care.

Sponsors

University of Kansas Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
Boston Scientific Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Parallel assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Males or females over 18 years of age 2. Patients with kidney stones, with stone burden larger than 15 mm. 3. Patients undergoing new percutaneous access with primary, supine, unilateral mini-PCNL.

Exclusion criteria

4. Simultaneous use of more than 1 laser platform or other form of fragmentation (e.g., ultrasonic). 5. Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of contralateral kidney stones during the same procedure. 6. Patients undergoing simultaneous treatment of ureteral stones during the same procedure. 7. Pregnant patients. 8. Presence of genitourinary anatomical abnormalities. 9. Uncorrected coagulopathy. 10. External urinary catheters. 11. Immunosuppressed patients. 12. Non-elective procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stone Lithotripsy time between HoYAG and TFLProcedureTime from scope insertion to scope removal

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total operative time between HoYAG and TFLProcedureTime from time-out to procedure finish
Stone Free Status between ClearPetra and traditional approach90 daysStone free is defined as no residual stones larger than 2mm in post operative CT scan
Laser EnergyProcedureLaser efficiency will be measured by evaluating the laser energy in kilojoules used during the procedure.
Laser TimeProcedureLaser efficiency will be measured by evaluating the time in minutes the laser was used during the procedure.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTJane Ledesma
jledesma2@kumc.edu913-588-8721
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBristol Whiles, MD

University of Kansas Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026