Skip to content

Assessment of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation's Clinical Efficacy in Treating Cognitive Impairment of Idiopathic Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases

Assessment of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation's Clinical Efficacy in Treating Cognitive Impairment of Idiopathic Inflammatory Demyelinating Diseases

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07087873
Acronym
TACS-CI-IIDDs
Enrollment
128
Registered
2025-07-28
Start date
2025-05-30
Completion date
2027-10-31
Last updated
2025-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis, Idiopathic Inflammatory Demyelinating Disorders of the Central Nervous System, MS (Multiple Sclerosis), NMOSD, Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

Brief summary

This study aims to explore the imaging and electrophysiological characteristics of idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IIDDs), and their correlation with clinical manifestations. It also evaluates the effectiveness of transcranial electrical stimulation in alleviating clinical symptoms of IIDDs patients, and analyzes the key factors affecting the treatment efficacy. By uncovering the overall and individual characteristics of IIDDs, this study seeks to enhance therapeutic outcomes through personalized neuromodulation programs. The findings will provide a basis for applying non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) in IIDDs treatment and offer new ideas for future personalized medicine approaches.

Interventions

DEVICENeuroelectrical modulation group

Participants received transcranial electrical stimulation using the Spanish Neuroelectrics StarStim 32 device.

DEVICEPseudo-neuromodulation group

Pseudo-stimulation is performed using the same equipment and procedures as in the neuromodulation group.

Sponsors

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-60 years old. * Diagnosis: Patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease, multiple sclerosis and other inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system that meet the diagnostic criteria. * Medications have been stable for at least three months.

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrence has been recorded in the past 3 months. * Have a pacemaker or other metal implant in the body. * Impaired skin integrity at the site of electrode placement. * Previous organic brain disease such as epilepsy, hydrocephalus, central nervous system tumors, brain injury, or intracranial infection. * Combined with severe or unstable organic diseases, such as heart, liver and kidney and other organ dysfunction. * Pregnant or lactating women, those who are planning to become pregnant in the near future. * Patient compliance is poor. * In the opinion of the investigator, there is a situation that is not suitable to participate in this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS scoreAt the 5-day point of treatment and 1 month following the end of treatment0-10 points, the higher the score, the more serious
Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) scaleAt the 5-day point of treatment and 1 month following the end of treatment0-110 points, the higher the score, the better the cognitive function
Scoring results for tasks 1 and 7 in the Alzheimer disease assessment scale-cog(ADAS-cog)At the 5-day point of treatment and 1 month following the end of treatmentthe higher the score, the better the cognitive function

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hamilton Depression Scale,HAMDAt the 5-day point of treatment and 1 month following the end of treatmentThe higher the score, the worse the depression.
Mini-mental State Examination(MMSE)At the 5-day point of treatment and 1 month following the end of treatment0-30,the higher the score, the better the cognitive function
a subjective questionnaire,adverse effectsFollowing the first day of treatment,Following the second day of treatment,Following the third day of treatment,Following the fourth day of treatment,Following the fifth day of treatmentThe intensity is scored from 0 to 4
Hamilton Anxiety Scale,HAMAAt the 5-day point of treatment and 1 month following the end of treatmentThe higher the score, the worse the anxiety.
Montreal-Cognitive Assessment(MoCA)At the 5-day point of treatment and 1 month following the end of treatment0-30,the higher the score, the better the cognitive function
Stroop Color-Word Test scoreAt the 5-day point of treatment and 1 month following the end of treatmentthe higher the score, the better the cognitive function

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary Contacthuang huijin, Ph.D.
huanghuijinmail@sina.com+8618510510804

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026