Skip to content

Resources for Optimizing Outcomes in Toddlers on the Spectrum

Expediting Access to Autism Specific Intervention for Young Autistic Children Living in Rural North Carolina: a Pilot Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07086781
Acronym
ROOTS
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-07-25
Start date
2025-07-19
Completion date
2028-07-31
Last updated
2025-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess whether telehealth-based Family Navigation (FN) expedites enrollment (e.g., reduces time in days) in community-based autism intervention for toddlers under the age of 4 living in Rural NC after their initial diagnosis of autism. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does Family Navigation decrease the time to initiation of intervention for rural toddlers with autism? Does Family Navigation improve developmental outcomes at 18 months post-diagnosis of autism? Does Family Navigation improve caregiver well-being? Caregivers in the Family Navigation condition will receive 4 research-based individual sessions with a trained navigator to support them in identifying and enrolling in recommended autism early intervention services. All navigation sessions will be delivered virtually via phone/Zoom. Researchers will compare participants who receive family navigation to participants who receive the standard of care (educational materials) to see if family navigation outperforms the standard of care.

Interventions

Participants randomized to the Family Navigation condition will receive up to 4 research-based individual sessions with a trained navigator to support them in identifying and enrolling in recommended autism early intervention services. All navigation sessions will be delivered virtually via phone/Zoom.

BEHAVIORALEducational Materials

The comparison condition (Educational Materials) consists of providing the participant's caregivers information about early intervention and community-based supports (i.e., infant-toddler programs, transition to school-based supports, family support groups, local organizations. Families in this condition will receive this information throughout 4 timepoints in the first 3 months after enrolling.

Sponsors

The Foundation of Hope for Research and Treatment of Mental Illness
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children up to 48 months who have a new diagnosis of autism (within the last month) or who are waiting for a diagnosis of autism AND their caregiver. * Live in North Carolina, in one of the 78 rural counties. * Caregiver must be over the age of 18 * The caregiver must speak conversationally fluent English.

Exclusion criteria

* No access to a telephone or internet connection for phone calls or video conferencing. * Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder is ruled out in the child.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to initiation of autism specific interventionDiagnosis to 18 months postThe date of initiation (date 1) of autism-specific intervention will be the date that families report the first session with a therapist following the diagnosis (date 2). Time will be calculated as the number of days elapsed between these two dates (date 2 - date 1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Raw Scores on Visual Reception domain of the MSELBaseline and 18 months post diagnosisThis outcome will assess individual-level change in raw scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Visual Reception domain. Raw scores will ne used instead of standard scores to detect meaningful change within-subject change. Standard scores in this population are known to exhibit floor effects in this population, which can obscure meaningful gains. Raw scores will be analyzed as continuous variables. The investigators will report change scores (follow-up minus baseline), individual trajectories, and summary statistics (mean, SD). Where appropriate, linear mixed-effects models or other growth modeling approaches will be used to account for within-subject variability. Higher scores on the MSEL indicate greater developmental progress. Raw scores on the Visual Reception domain range from 0-50.
Change in Raw Scores on Expressive Language domain of the MSELBaseline and 18 months post diagnosisThis outcome will assess individual-level change in raw scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Expressive Language domain. Raw scores will be used instead of standard scores to detect meaningful change within-subject change. Standard scores in this population are known to exhibit floor effects in this population, which can obscure meaningful gains. Raw scores will be analyzed as continuous variables. The investigators will report change scores (follow-up minus baseline), individual trajectories, and summary statistics (mean, SD). Where appropriate, linear mixed-effects models or other growth modeling approaches will be used to account for within-subject variability. Higher scores on the MSEL indicate greater developmental progress. Raw scores on the Expressive Language domain range from 0 - 50.
Caregiver Well-Being Score6 months post diagnosisScores on the General Well-Being Schedule will be used to measure caregiver well-being. Total scores range from 0-110. Higher scores are indicative of more positive well-being. There are 3 proposed scoring cut-points: 0-60 reflects severe distress, 61-72 reflects moderate distress, and 73-110 reflects positive well-being). The investigators will compare means and standard deviations between groups.
Change in Raw Scores on Fine Motor domain of the MSELBaseline and 18 months post diagnosisThis outcome will assess individual-level change in raw scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Fine Motor domain. Raw scores will be used instead of standard scores to detect meaningful change within-subject change. Standard scores in this population are known to exhibit floor effects in this population, which can obscure meaningful gains. Raw scores will be analyzed as continuous variables. The investigators will report change scores (follow-up minus baseline), individual trajectories, and summary statistics (mean, SD). Where appropriate, linear mixed-effects models or other growth modeling approaches will be used to account for within-subject variability. Higher scores on the MSEL indicate greater developmental progress. Raw scores on the Visual Reception domain range from 0 - 49.
Change in Raw Scores on ABAS-3 Conceptual, Social and Practical DomainsBaseline and 18 months post diagnosisThis outcome will assess change in raw scores for each of the three adaptive domains (Conceptual, Social and Practical) from the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Third Edition (ABAS-3). Raw scores offer greater sensitivity for detecting within-subject developmental changes over time. Each domain will be analyzed separately as a continuous variable. Where applicable, domain raw scores will also be summed to provide an exploratory composite. Higher scores indicate greater adaptive skill development. Conceptual domain raw score range: 0-222 Social domain raw score range: 0 - 144 Practical domain raw score range: 0-279
Change in Raw Scores on Receptive Language domain of the MSELBaseline and 18 months post diagnosisThis outcome will assess individual-level change in raw scores on the Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL), Receptive Language domain. Raw scores will be used instead of standard scores to detect meaningful change within-subject change. Standard scores in this population are known to exhibit floor effects in this population, which can obscure meaningful gains. Raw scores will be analyzed as continuous variables. The investigators will report change scores (follow-up minus baseline), individual trajectories, and summary statistics (mean, SD). Where appropriate, linear mixed-effects models or other growth modeling approaches will be used to account for within-subject variability. Higher scores on the MSEL indicate greater developmental progress. Raw scores on the Receptive Language domain range from 0 - 48.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactKelly E Caravella, PhD
kelly_caravella@med.unc.edu203-524-4349

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026