Skip to content

PERceptions of Diltiazem Versus ADEnosine for Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia in the Emergency Department

PERceptions of Diltiazem Versus ADEnosine for Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia in the Emergency Department: PERVADE-ED Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07086560
Acronym
PERVADE-ED
Enrollment
100
Registered
2025-07-25
Start date
2025-04-04
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT)

Keywords

diltiazem, adenosine, emergency medicine, supraventricular tachycardia

Brief summary

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a dysrhythmia characterized rapid heart rate, typically with rapid onset. SVT accounts for over 50,000 emergency department visits per year. Of patients with regular, narrow-complex SVT, the mainstay of therapy includes adenosine and diltiazem. Adenosine is recommend by American and European guidelines as first-line therapy, however adenosine carries unique side effects that are potentially distressing to patients, including: "feeling of impending death or doom", flushing, anxiety, shortness of breath, and chest discomfort. Diltiazem does not carry this side effect profile, but has typically been reserved as second-line treatment due to side effects of low blood pressure associated with this class of medications. Diltiazem and adenosine have not been well studied head-to-head to compare safety and efficacy of their treatment for SVT. The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of adenosine and diltiazem for SVT in the ED (as completed through chart review of specific patient-level outcomes) and capture patient and clinician perspectives of medication satisfaction (through administration of questionnaires).

Interventions

DRUGIV adenosine

Patients will not be randomized to intervention but will be categorized based on the exposure of IV adenosine for treatment of SVT received prior to study enrollment

DRUGIV diltiazem

Patients will not be randomized to intervention but will be categorized based on the exposure of IV diltiazem for treatment of SVT received prior to study enrollment

Sponsors

University of Iowa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ED encounter for acute SVT 2. Age \>/= 18 years 3. Receipt of IV adenosine and/or IV diltiazem for SVT in the ED or prehospital setting

Exclusion criteria

1. Neurologic status precluding survey participation due to medical instability 2. Pregnant 3. Incarcerated 4. Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction with SVT treatmentPrimary outcome will be assessed during ED visitPatient satisfaction with treatment will be assessed using a Likert scale questionnaire of 1-5. Participants will indicate their satisfaction with treatment by indicating a score of 1-5, 1 being "not at all satisfied" and 5 being "extremely satisfied".

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAnne Zepeski, PharmD
anne-zepeski@uiowa.edu651-207-9357

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 22, 2026