Skip to content

Study and Modeling of Perforator Flap Vascularization

Study and Modeling of Perforator Flap Vascularization

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07084740
Acronym
EMoVaLP
Enrollment
20
Registered
2025-07-24
Start date
2026-02-15
Completion date
2026-07-15
Last updated
2026-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Eschar, Reconstructive Surgery Using Pedicled Perforating or Free Perforating Flaps, Traumatic Pathology of the Lower and/or Upper Limb

Keywords

Perforasome, perforator flap, PeriCam, Periflux EPOS, tissue perfusion

Brief summary

The aim of reconstructive surgery is to restore physical integrity altered by trauma, congenital malformations or cancerous pathologies. Several techniques are available, including flap surgery, which enables tissue to be moved from one anatomical location to another. Perforating skin/subcutaneous flaps are segments of skin and subcutaneous cellular tissue vascularized by a feeder vascular pedicle. This surgical technique has virtually zero donor-site morbidity, as it is no longer necessary to harvest muscle to ensure reliable vascularization of the flap. Flap vascularization is a variable mechanism, complex to describe and understand. For cutaneous and subcutaneous (fatty) flaps, which account for the majority of flaps used, perforator flaps (vascularized by a subcutaneous perforator artery) have become the benchmark. Unfortunately, their vascularization is currently poorly understood, and depends on experimental work carried out on fresh cadaveric anatomical specimens. These cadaveric studies fail to take into account several key factors influencing perforasomes (perforasome: skin territory vascularized by a pedicle), namely body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, intraoperative patient position and biological parameters.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPeriCam and PeriFlux measurements

PeriCam and PeriFlux measurements

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 70 * Reconstructive surgery using pedicled perforating flap or free perforating flap. * Flap with a surface area of at least 50 cm2 (in order to have a sufficiently large surface area for good perfusion visualization) * Pedicled perforating flaps group: Patients with pelvic eschar * Free perforating flaps group: Traumatic pathology of the lower and/or upper limb

Exclusion criteria

* No consent obtained * No social security affiliation * Persons under court protection * Persons participating in another study with an exclusion period still in progress

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps (flow speed)Between Day -1 and Day +1 of surgerywith PeriCam device
study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps (Infusion quality)Between Day -1 and Day +1 of surgerywith PeriCam device
study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps (Oxygenation quality)Between Day -1 and Day +1 of surgerywith PeriFlux device
study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps (Colorimetric infusion quality scale)Between Day -1 and Day +1 of surgerywith PeriCam device

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps (flow speed)Between Day -1 and Day +3 of surgerywith PeriCam device
study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps (Infusion quality)Between Day -1 and Day +3 of surgerywith PeriCam device
study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps (Oxygenation quality)Between Day -1 and Day +3 of surgerywith PeriFlux device
study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps (Colorimetric infusion quality scale)Between Day -1 and Day +3 of surgerywith PeriCam device
Study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps in relation to ultrasound exploration (flap perforating vessel flow)Between Day -1 and Day +1 of surgery
Study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps in relation to clinical observations (skin recoloration time)Between Day -1 and Day +1 of surgery
Number of participants with signs of tissue suffering (delayed capillary refill, color change, skin breakdown, blister) as observed on clinical examinationBetween Day -1 and Day +1 of surgeryClinical signs of tissue suffering will be recorded based on predefined clinical criteria: capillary refill time \> 3 seconds, local discoloration (pallor or cyanosis), or cutaneous ulceration or blisters. These signs will be assessed by a trained plastic surgeon and documented on standardized observation forms.
Study the superficial tissue perfusion of flaps in relation to clinical observations ( scarring).Between Day -1 and Day +1 of surgeryScarification will be performed on the flap surface in the area suspected of tissue compromise, using a sterile needle to superficially scratch the skin. The assessment will document whether bleeding occurs at the site of scarification. If bleeding is present, it will be classified as: arterial bleeding (bright red), venous bleeding (dark red), no bleeding (indicative of dry necrosis or severe ischemia).

Countries

France

Contacts

CONTACTChristian HERLIN, MD, PhD
c-herlin@chu-montpellier.fr+33467330589
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristian HERLIN, MD, PhD

University Hospital, Montpellier

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 14, 2026