Skip to content

Hypofractionated vs Conventional RT After Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

Randomized Controlled Trial of Postmastectomy Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Fractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07084519
Enrollment
190
Registered
2025-07-24
Start date
2025-08-10
Completion date
2030-12-31
Last updated
2025-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Breast Reconstruction, Radiation Oncology

Keywords

breast cancer, prosthetic breast reconstruction, hypofractionated radiotherapy

Brief summary

This study investigates the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) versus conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) in breast cancer patients undergoing total mastectomy with prosthetic reconstruction. Study Design Population: Patients with high-risk breast cancer after mastectomy and immediate implant reconstruction. Intervention: HFRT Arm: 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions (2.9 Gy/fraction, 3 weeks). Control Arm: CFRT (50 Gy in 25 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 5 weeks). Endpoints Primary: Reconstruction failure rate (e.g., implant removal, capsular contracture)

Interventions

RADIATIONhypofractionated radiotherapy

43.5 Gy in 15 fractions (2.9 Gy/fraction, 3 weeks)

50 Gy in 25 fractions, 2 Gy/fraction, 5 weeks

Sponsors

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female, aged 18-75 years * Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60 * Histopathologically confirmed invasive breast adenocarcinoma * Total mastectomy \[with or without nipple-areolar complex preservation\] + axillary dissection/sentinel lymph node biopsy + implant/expander placement R0 resection with negative margins * pT3 or N2-3 disease; or pT1-2N1 * No distant metastasis * Completed standard neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy cycles * ≤8 weeks post-chemotherapy or ≤12 weeks post-surgery if no chemotherapy * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prior radiotherapy to chest wall or nodal regions * Pregnancy or lactation * T4 stage disease * Pre-radiotherapy local/regional/distant metastasis * Grade ≥3 implant-related adverse events irreversible before radiotherapy * Bilateral breast cancer requiring bilateral radiotherapy * Concurrent/secondary malignancy with disease-free interval \<5 years \[except non-melanoma skin cancer, papillary/follicular thyroid cancer, or cervical carcinoma in situ\] * Active collagen vascular disease, e.g., SLE, scleroderma * Uncontrolled comorbidities: acute cardiovascular disease, substance abuse, or psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reconstruction Failure Rate2 yearimplant removal, capsular contracture ≥ Baker grade III

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiation-Related Toxicities2 yeargrade ≥3 dermatitis, pneumonitis, lymphedema
DFS5 yearDisease-Free Survival
OS5 yearOverall Survival
LRR5 yearLocoregional Recurrence Rate
Other Implant-Related Adverse Events2 yearinfection, skin necrosis, implant exposure
Cosmetic Outcome Assessed by Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale (Physician-Rated)1 yearPhysicians will assess cosmetic outcome using the Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale. Unit of Measure: Score on Harvard Breast Cosmesis Scale Scale Information: Score range from 1 (Excellent) to 4 (Poor). Higher scores indicate worse cosmetic outcomes.
Patient-Reported Cosmetic Outcome1 yearDescription: Patients will self-assess cosmetic outcome using a 4-point Likert scale. Unit of Measure: Score on 4-point Likert scale. Scale Information: Score range from 1 (Excellent) to 4 (Poor). Higher scores indicate worse perceived outcome.
Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status ScoreBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months after treatmentThe European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) will be used to evaluate patients' global health status and overall quality of life. Unit of Measure: Score on a scale Scale Information: Score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better global health status.
Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-BR23 Breast Cancer ModuleBaseline, 6 months, and 12 months after treatmentThe EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Breast Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-BR23) will be used to assess breast cancer-specific quality of life. Unit of Measure: Score on a scale Scale Information: Score ranges from 0 to 100. For functional scales, higher scores indicate better function; for symptom scales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
DM5 yearDistant Metastasis Rate

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactXuran Zhao, MD
923791362@qq.com86-13661135602
Backup ContactYirui Zhai, MD
januarywind@163.com86-18610168510

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026