Skip to content

*Effect of Prophylactic CBD Stenting Versus Non Stenting on Recurrence of CBD Stones in Patients Awaiting Cholecystectomy*

*Effect of Prophylactic Common Bile Duct Stenting Versus Non Stenting on Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones in Patients Awaiting Cholecystectomy*

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07084493
Enrollment
88
Registered
2025-07-24
Start date
2025-08-31
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Calcular Obstructive Jaundice

Keywords

CBD stones, ERCP

Brief summary

Primary objective: Compare recurrence rates of CBD stones in stented versus non-stented patients. Secondary objectives: Identify predictors of stone recurrence. Assess the incidence and risk factors for post-ERCP complications. Evaluate time to recurrence and rate of hospital readmissions. Explore impact on quality of life and ease of subsequent cholecystectomy.

Detailed description

Choledocholithiasis, the presence of stones in the common bile duct (CBD), occurs in 10-20% of patients with symptomatic gallstones and can lead to severe complications such as obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, and pancreatitis Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (\*\*ERCP\*\*) with stone extraction is the gold standard treatment, achieving \>90% success rates in ductal clearance. Despite successful initial clearance, CBD stone recurrence remains a significant issue, with reported rates ranging from 4% to 24% . To reduce recurrence, prophylactic biliary stenting has been proposed, particularly in high-risk patients (e.g., large or multiple stones, dilated CBD, periampullary diverticulum) However, its routine use remains controversial due to conflicting evidence on efficacy, stent-related complications (e.g., migration, occlusion, cholangitis), and increased healthcare costs.

Interventions

DEVICECBD stent either a 7-Fr and 7 cm or a 10-Fr and 7-cm OR double-pigtail stent

prophylactic CBD stent either a 7-Fr and 7 cm or a 10-Fr and 7-cm double-pigtail stent

prophylactic CBD stent either a 7-Fr and 7 cm or a 10-Fr and 7-cm double-pigtail stent

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Following ERCP and biliary duct clearance, participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either: Stent Group: Placement of a prophylactic CBD stent will be placed. Control Group: No stent placement after biliary clearance. Patients will be monitored every month until cholecystectomy or up to 3 months, whichever comes first. Follow-up includes: Clinical assessment. LFTs and pancreatic enzymes. Imaging: US (MRCP if symptomatic). Stent removal (if placed) at 3 months or earlier if symptomatic. Repeat ERCP for recurrence.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years. * Documented CBD stones by various imaging or ERCP. * Successful biliary clearance by ERCP. * Scheduled for elective cholecystectomy within 3 months. * Provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous biliary surgery. * Known malignancy involving the biliary system. * Comorbid conditions preventing surgery such as bleeding tendency. * Pregnancy. * Failure to obtain consent. * Failed stone clearance.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Recurrence of CBD stones within 3 months, confirmed by imaging or ERCP.3 monthsRecurrence of CBD stones within 3 months, confirmed by imaging or ERCP.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactHuda Mokhtar Huda Mokhtar, Assistant lecturer, master degree
hudamokhtar2571994@aun.edu.eg0201154664323

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026