Skip to content

Quantitative Versus qUAlitative NeuromoniToring of neUroMuscular Block for Non-cardiothoracic Surgery

Quantitative Versus qUAlitative NeuromoniToring of neUroMuscular Block for Non-cardiothoracic Surgery (The QUANTUM Trial): Single-center Cluster Randomized Multiple Crossover Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07084363
Acronym
QUANTUM
Enrollment
1032
Registered
2025-07-24
Start date
2025-09-22
Completion date
2026-04-01
Last updated
2025-10-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuromuscular Block, Residual

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of quantitative block monitoring versus less expensive qualitative monitoring treatment effects on the lowest SpO2/FiO2 ratio in the PACU. The results will be incorporated into an enhanced recovery pathway for surgical patients.

Interventions

DEVICEQuantitative monitoring

The TetraGraph TOF monitor will be used to quantitatively assess the TOF-ratio. Quantitative monitoring includes objective measurement of the TOF-ratio, as defined by the ratio between the first and the fourth muscular responses and is quantified by acceleromyography. A TOF twitch response ratio equal or greater to 95% (TOF0.95) will be targeted prior to extubation. If TOF0.95 is not reached within 10 min of administering the initial dose of the respective reversal agent, redosing is recommended.

OTHERQualitative monitoring

Clinicians will assess the TOF-ratio. Qualitative monitoring includes subjective assessment of the count and the amplitude of the muscular responses related to neuromuscular block depth. A TOF twitch response count of 4 similarly strong twitches will be targeted prior to extubation. If 4 similarly strong TOF twitch responses are not reached within 10 min of administering the initial dose of the respective reversal agent, redosing is recommended.

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Designated operating rooms of the hospital will be cluster randomized in this study. For each week of the 24-week trial, the designated operating rooms will be randomized to either quantitative or qualitative TOF monitoring.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient age ≥ 18 years old; * General anesthesia with endotracheal intubation; * Neuromuscular block with rocuronium.

Exclusion criteria

* Intubation before induction of anesthesia; * Critically ill patients admitted from the ICU; * Emergency cases; * Non-intubated patients; * Patients who will not be paralyzed through the surgery (spine). * Patients with an implanted electronic device (e.g. cardiac pacemaker) * Patients with allergies to adhesive * Patients with pre-existing neuromuscular disease (e.g. Myasthenia Gravis)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
lowest SpO2/FiO2 ratio in the PACU (constant for at least 10 minutes)During the time in PACU (about 30 minutes to 6 hours)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Collapsed composite (any vs none) of postoperative pulmonary complicationsDuring length of hospital stay (about 1 day to a week)

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactMehmet Turan, MD
Mehmet.A.Turan@uth.tmc.edu(713) 500-6251
Backup ContactMohammad Khudirat
Mohammad.Khudirat@uth.tmc.edu(713) 500-5558

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026