Skip to content

Scapular Repositioning for Neck Pain and Scapular Dysfunction

Effects of Scapular Repositioning on Pain, Range of Motion, Proprioception, and Pressure Pain Threshold in Patients With Neck Pain and Scapular Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07083570
Enrollment
78
Registered
2025-07-24
Start date
2025-08-10
Completion date
2025-12-19
Last updated
2026-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain, Scapular Dyskinesis

Keywords

Neck pain, Scapular dysfunction, Scapular repositioning, Exercise, Intervention

Brief summary

This randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the effects of scapular repositioning in individuals with neck pain and scapular dysfunction. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Does scapular repositioning reduce neck pain, increase range of motion, and improve joint position sense and pressure pain threshold? 2. Which type of scapular repositioning technique is more effective? Participants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1. Active scapular repositioning: The examiner will first passively position the scapula in a neutral position on the posterior chest wall. The participant will then be instructed to actively maintain that position for 10 seconds. This procedure will be repeated for 10 repetitions, with a 10-second rest interval between each repetition. 2. Passive scapular repositioning: The examiner will passively position and hold the scapula in a neutral position for 10 seconds. This procedure will be repeated for 10 repetitions, with a 10-second rest interval between each repetition. 3. Sham scapular repositioning (control): The examiner will perform gentle shoulder movements that do not alter scapular positioning. Each movement will be held for 10 seconds, repeated 10 times, with a 10-second rest interval between repetitions. All participants will undergo pre- and post-intervention assessments (immediately after the intervention and at 30 minutes post-intervention). The primary outcomes include neck pain intensity, cervical range of motion, cervical and shoulder proprioception, and pressure pain threshold. All outcomes will be compared between groups and across time points (pre- and post-intervention).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALActive scapular repositioning

The examiner will first passively position the participant's scapula in a neutral position on the posterior chest wall. The participant will then be instructed to actively maintain that position.

PROCEDUREPassive scapular repositioning

The examiner will passively position and hold the participant's scapula in a neutral position.

PROCEDURESham scapular repositioning

The examiner will perform gentle shoulder girdle movements that do not alter scapular positioning.

Sponsors

University of Phayao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

1. Active scapular repositioning 2. Passive scapular repositioning 3. Sham scapular repositioning (control)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic idiopathic neck pain for ≥3 months * An average pain intensity over the past week ≥3 mm on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) * A current score of at least 10/100 on the Neck Disability Index-Thai version * Having altered scapular alignment ipsilateral to the more painful side of neck pain

Exclusion criteria

* History of neck injury or surgery * History of shoulder girdle pain, fracture, surgery or dislocation * History of neurological conditions (e.g. stroke, Parkinson's disease, brachial plexus injury) * History of marked spinal abnormalities (e.g. kyphosis, scoliosis) and other musculoskeletal conditions that could affect the scapular movement (e.g. myofascial pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, inflammatory joint disease, and/or autoimmune diseases) * Have participated in any specific training of the neck or shoulder girdle muscles in the last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neck pain intensityBaseline, immediately after the intervention and at 30 minutes post-interventionNeck pain intensity measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-100 mm, where higher scores indicate worse pain).
Cervical range of motionBaseline, immediately after the intervention and at 30 minutes post-interventionCervical range of motion measured using a goniometer in flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion, and left and right rotation (measured in degrees).
Cervical and shoulder proprioceptionBaseline, immediately after the intervention and at 30 minutes post-interventionCervical joint position error (JPE) measured using a laser pointer mounted on a headband at the center of the head during blindfolded active extension and left/right rotation. Shoulder joint position error (JPE) measured using a laser pointer placed proximal to the lateral epicondyle during blindfolded active shoulder flexion and abduction. An absolute error between starting and return positions will be recorded in millimeters and converted to degrees. Higher values indicate greater impairment.
Pressure pain threshold at upper trapezius and levator scapulae musclesBaseline, immediately after the intervention and at 30 minutes post-interventionPressure pain threshold (PPT) measured by algometer; values recorded in Newtons (N), with lower scores indicating greater pain sensitivity (worse outcome).

Countries

Thailand

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 28, 2026