Skip to content

Personalized Stimulation Loop for Neurorehabilitation in Parkinson: a Proof-of-principle Study

Personalized Stimulation Loop for Neurorehabilitation in Parkinson: a Proof-of-principle Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07082595
Acronym
StimuLOOP_PD-S
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-07-24
Start date
2025-07-07
Completion date
2028-03-31
Last updated
2025-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Parkinson disease, Sleep, Neurorehabilitation, Auditory stimulation, StimuLOOP

Brief summary

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease that affects about 1% of the elderly population and accounts for substantial disability and health care costs. Disability is largely driven by mobility deficits caused by impaired gait. Effective treatments are available to restore lower limb function and improve gait, but response to treatment varies greatly from patient to patient and often shows only small effect sizes. Addressing this heterogeneity requires personalization, a concept referred to precision neurorehabilitation. StimuLOOP.PD-Sleep intends to foster structured and reproducible methods for precision neurorehabilitation of gait in PD. The investigators will conduct a proof-of-concept study to investigate a sleep intervention tailored to the individual patient in the context of motor rehabilitation. • Targeted auditory stimulation during sleep (TASS): The investigators aim to reactive rehabilitation-related memories through presentation of auditory stimuli during sleep with the goal of promoting motor memory consolidation into stable motor commands. The investigators will leverage TASS to enhance consolidation of the movement patterns that are learned during rehabilitation. The investigators expect that this intervention will lead to greater gains in functional walking ability and balance. Beyond demonstrating a proof-of-concept for novel methods of applying TASS stimulation in the context of neurorehabilitation, positive results of this project may have implications for neurorehabilitation treatment in general by providing first insights into the benefits and interplay of TASS with a rehabilitation.

Interventions

OTHERTASS Intervention (Sham)

Participants will sleep with the portable EEG (TSB, Axo, Tosoo AG, Zurich, CH) during 15 days of their regular motor rehabilitation. No auditory stimuli will be delivered.

OTHERTASS Intervention (Verum)

TASS: Participants will sleep with the portable EEG (TSB, Axo, Tosoo AG, Zurich, CH) during 15 days of their regular motor rehabilitation. Auditory stimuli will be delivered through the integrated headphones when non-rapid-eye-movement (NREM) sleep is detected during the night to induce TASS.

Sponsors

ETH Zurich (Switzerland)
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Zurich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Idiopathic Parkinson's disease with gait and postural stability deficits * ≥18 years of age * UPDRS III gait scores 1-3 * UPDRS III postural instability scores 1-3 * Prescribed rehabilitation therapy * Informed consent as documented by signature * Adjustments in dopaminergic medication and DBS stimulation to improve

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCa) \< 20 * Other neurological or medical condition that caused sustained clinically relevant gait and/or postural stability deficits * History of a physical or neurological condition that interferes with study procedures * Social and/or personal circumstances that interfere with the ability to return for assessments * Patients taking benzodiazepines or Z-drugs that have a significant effect on sleep EEG * Recent DBS implant (≤ 6 months) * Inability to perform outcome assessments without walking aid * Skin disorders/problems/allergies in face/ear area that could worsen with electrode application (e.g. nickel allergy)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
functional walking abilityBaseline, one to three days after the last intervention day (post-assessment), one month after the last intervention day (follow-up assessment).the change in functional walking ability assessed with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT)
postural stabilityBaseline, one to three days after the last intervention day (post-assessment), one month after the last intervention day (follow-up assessment).the change in postural stability assessed with the MiniBEST test measured before and after the intervention period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VariabilityBaseline, one to three days after the last intervention day (post-assessment), one month after the last intervention day (follow-up assessment).Motor learning assessed via changes in variability. Variability assessed using the coefficient of variation (%CV) of common spatio-temporal gait parameters, including stride time, stride length, step length, swing time, stance time, step width, and double limb support time.
Phase Coordination IndexBaseline, one to three days after the last intervention day (post-assessment), one month after the last intervention day (follow-up assessment).Motor learning assessed via changes in coordination. Coordination assessed using the Phase Coordination Index.
Margin of StabilityBaseline, one to three days after the last intervention day (post-assessment), one month after the last intervention day (follow-up assessment).Motor learning assessed via changes in stability. Stability assessed using Margin of Stability
SymmetryBaseline, one to three days after the last intervention day (post-assessment), one month after the last intervention day (follow-up assessment).Motor learning assessed via changes in symmetry. Symmetry (%) in step length and step time.
Continuous Relative PhaseBaseline, one to three days after the last intervention day (post-assessment), one month after the last intervention day (follow-up assessment).Motor learning assessed via changes in coordination. Coordination assessed using Continous Relative Phase.

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

Primary ContactChristian Baumann, Prof. Dr. med.
christian.baumann@usz.ch+41 44 255 00 02
Backup ContactAngelina Maric, Dr. phil.
angelina.maric@usz.ch+ 41 255 86 15

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026