Maxilofacial, Patient Satisfaction
Conditions
Keywords
maxillofacial cases, limited mouth opening, obturator
Brief summary
A patient's quality of life is frequently negatively impacted by oral cancer, which is a serious condition. Treatment for oral cancer, which includes radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, can result in several oral complications. The risk of impression material becoming lodged in undercuts and the challenges in retrieving the material would be inconvenient for both the patient and the dentist. Therefore, a digital pathway was chosen for the prosthesis fabrication process So, the present study aims to investigate the patient comfort and satisfaction after the construction of maxillary interim obturator for radiation-induced trismus in maxillofacial cases with different approaches: conventional and digital fabrication processes.
Detailed description
A patient's quality of life is frequently negatively impacted by oral cancer, which is a serious condition. Treatment for oral cancer, which includes radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery, can result in several oral complications, including trismus, xerostomia, dysgeusia, odontogenic infections, and osteoradionecrosis. Aim: the present study aims to investigate the patient comfort and satisfaction after the construction of maxillary interim obturator for radiation-induced trismus in maxillofacial cases with different approaches: conventional and digital fabrication processes. Methodology: The present crossover study will be conducted on 30 maxillofacial patients with maxillary defect with limited mouth opening, aged between 50 -65 years, will be selected for the study from the Maxillofacial clinic of the Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University.A preliminary impression of the maxillary defect will be made with a high-viscosity irreversible hydrocolloid, covering all the margins of the defect and blocking all unfavorable undercuts with wet gauge piece.In a simple randomized method, 15 patients will receive obturator fabricated by the digital method.The other 15 patients will receive obturator fabricated by the conventional method Patient comfort and satisfaction by visual analogue scale (VAS), and Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ) at follow-up periods as follows: T0 immediately after insertion of obturator, T1= three months after insertion of obturator, T2=six months after insertion of obturator.
Interventions
OTHERThe patient will be instructed about wearing the prosthesis. First, seat the prosthesis in a posterior undercut, then rotate the prosthesis slightly superiorly in the defect area and engage the anteri
* The obturator will then be printed using Denture Base Resin and teeth. * The printed obturator will be tried in, two magnets, one anteriorly and another posteriorly will be picked up then inserted into the patient mouth. * The patient will be again instructed regarding the care of the prosthesis and hygiene maintenance as formerly. The patient will also be instructed to wear the obturator plate first, and once this is comfortably seated, the denture part will be inserted. During removal, the patient will be instructed to first remove the denture part gently to disengage the magnetic attraction after the obturator part as formerly instructed. The patient will be recalle
Sponsors
Mansoura University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Patient with unilateral total maxillectomy. Free from any signs of inflammation in the defect area. The defect size is large.
Exclusion criteria
Patient is still receiving radiation. The defect size is small. Defects result from trauma.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| VAS of pain | six months | 1-The patients used a visual analogue scale (VAS) to self-assess their level of pain, with 10 representing the most severe pain. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ) | six months | The GTQ seems to be the most reliable tool for measuring trismus that is now available since a more comprehensive assessment of trismus and its treatment effects requires a multidimensional, self-administered, trismus-specific measure, which is what the GTQ offers. Its wider applicability would allow for consistent recording of trismus-related issues and a chance to get patient feedback on treatment results. The updated GTQ version had 13 items spread over three domains: eating restriction (4 items), jaw-related issues (6 items), and muscular stress (3 items). Scores on the calculated scale vary from 0 to 100. |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed