Skip to content

Can We Reliably Needle Hip Muscles Blindly?

Can We Reliably Needle Hip Region Muscles Without Imaging? A Muscle-Specific Accuracy Study Using Ultrasound

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07079033
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-07-22
Start date
2025-09-28
Completion date
2025-09-30
Last updated
2025-09-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Needling

Keywords

dry needling, trigger point, ultrasound guidance

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of invasive interventions (dry needling or injection) performed on specific muscles of the hip region in reaching the anatomical target. The accuracy of the interventions performed with a blinded method will be compared with an observational assessment supported by ultrasonography. The interventions will be performed by a physician with clinical experience, and the anatomical location of the needle tip will be evaluated by a second physician with ultrasonography after each procedure. The targeted muscles include the iliacus, pectineus, sartorius, tensor fascia latae, and rectus femoris. Each participant will be subjected to interventions for five different muscles, and a total of at least 40 injection interventions will be analyzed. Ultrasonography will be used only for observation and verification purposes; no pharmacological substances will be applied during the procedure. All procedures will be performed under sterile conditions, and participants will be monitored for 24 hours for possible pain, bruising, or complications. Participants will be informed about the content and purpose of the study, and written informed consent forms will be obtained. The study does not have a therapeutic purpose and is only intended to investigate targeting accuracy. The data to be obtained is expected to contribute to the determination of anatomical accuracy rates in clinical practices and the improvement of interventional training processes.

Detailed description

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of muscle targeting when dry needling injections are performed using the blinded (anatomical landmark-based) technique. The accuracy of these injections will be assessed by confirming the needle placement with ultrasonography immediately after each attempt. According to existing literature, the accuracy of blinded injection techniques is reported to be approximately 67%, while ultrasound-guided injections achieve an accuracy of about 92%. A power analysis was conducted using these proportions to detect a statistically significant difference between the two methods. Based on these values, Cohen's h effect size was calculated as 0.66. With a significance level (alpha) of 0.05 and a statistical power of 80%, a minimum of 74 injection attempts are required. In this study, each participant will receive injections into five different muscles suspected to be involved in myofascial pain. With 15 participants, this will result in 75 injection attempts, thereby meeting the required sample size for adequate power. Eligible participants will be adults aged 18-65 presenting with nonspecific hip, groin, or anterior thigh pain and referred for physical therapy. The study particularly focuses on individuals with suspected myofascial pain syndrome in deep or less accessible hip-related muscles, such as the iliacus, pectineus, and sartorius. All participants must be clinically indicated for dry needling or similar interventions and capable of cooperating with the procedure. Ultrasonographic evaluation will be used only to confirm needle placement, not to guide the injection. This allows for the assessment of the real-world accuracy of the blinded technique, which is commonly used in routine clinical practice. The findings will provide insight into the reliability of this method and help guide training and clinical decision-making in musculoskeletal and pain management practices.

Interventions

Dry needling is performed using anatomical landmarks without ultrasound guidance. Needle placement is then confirmed via ultrasound imaging.

Sponsors

Erzurum Regional Training & Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Dry needling is performed using anatomical landmarks without ultrasound guidance. Needle placement is then confirmed via ultrasound imaging.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18 to 65 years * Individuals with nonspecific hip, groin, or anterior thigh pain who are scheduled for physical therapy * Clinical suspicion of myofascial pain syndrome, particularly involving muscles around the hip * Patients with clinical indication for dry needling or similar invasive treatments (e.g., targeting muscles such as iliacus, pectineus, sartorius) * Ability to cooperate with the procedure * Ability to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Use of anticoagulant medications (due to increased risk of bleeding) * Severe hip osteoarthritis, presence of hip prosthesis, history of previous hip surgery, or significant anatomical deformity * Active infection or skin lesion at the planned injection site * Inability to cooperate or communicate effectively * Pregnancy * Presence of serious systemic illnesses (e.g., malignancy, neurological disorders)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy of Blinded Dry Needling InjectionsImmediately after each injection attemptProportion of injection attempts in which the needle accurately reaches the intended target muscle using the blinded (anatomical landmark-based) technique, as confirmed by ultrasonography.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Accuracy Rate per Target MuscleImmediately after each injection attemptDetermination of individual accuracy rates for each of the five specific muscles injected using the blinded technique (e.g., iliacus, pectineus, sartorius, etc.), based on ultrasound confirmation.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Inter-Operator Variability in Injection Accuracy2 weekEvaluation of variability in injection accuracy among different clinicians performing the blinded technique, based on ultrasound-confirmed needle placements.

Contacts

Primary Contactnurmuhammet tas
nu_mu_ta@hotmail.com+905323380237

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026