Skip to content

A Real World Data Collection of Human Amniotic Membrane(s) on Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Venous Leg Ulcers, Pressure Ulcers and Post Operative Wounds.

A Real World Data Collection of Human Amniotic Membrane(s) on Diabetic Foot Ulcers, Venous Leg Ulcers, Pressure Ulcers and Post Operative Wounds.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07078968
Enrollment
500
Registered
2025-07-22
Start date
2025-04-23
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2026-06-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU), Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU)

Brief summary

This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™ and Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ compared to the effectiveness of Standard of Care alone though a retrospective data collection.

Detailed description

This is a retrospective multi-center study collecting real world evidence on the use of Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ and Standard of Care alone in subjects with eligible DFUs, VLUs, PUs, and post operative wounds that have not healed with conventional therapy for greater than or equal to 4 weeks.

Interventions

DEVICETri-Membrane Wrap™

Membrane Wrap™

Membrane Wrap™

DEVICEMembrane Wrap-Hydro™

Membrane Wrap-Hydro™

OTHERStandard of Care

Basic care involves debridement, along with local wound care depending on the wound needs. Debridement involves removal of fibrin and devitalized tissue from the base and the borders of the ulcer which is necessary in all treatment plans to reduce the risk of infection and promote healing.

Sponsors

BioLab Holdings
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subject had the presence of diabetic foot ulcers, Venous insufficiency ulcers, pressure ulcers and/or post-operative wounds 2. Subject has retrospectively been treated with Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™ and Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ or Subject has retrospectively been treated with Standard of Care only. 3. Subjects should have been treated from January 2022 to present day.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects that did not have a wound closure verification appointment. 2. Any subject who received any product other than Tri-Membrane Wrap™, Membrane Wrap™ and Membrane Wrap-Hydro™ during their treatment time.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Frequency of wound closure by or on week 1616 weeksWound closure is defined as: Full epithelialization of the wound with the absence of drainage. Epithelialization is defined as a layer of epithelium visible on the wound surface

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound improvement by or on End of Study (EOS) from baseline16 weeksDefined by: \>60% reduction in area, or \>60% reduction in depth, or \>75% reduction in volume
Incidence of wound recurrence within the 16-week study period16 weeksIncidence of wound recurrence within the 16-week study period
Mean number of wound free days within the 16-week study period16 weeksMean number of wound free days within the 16-week study period

Countries

United States

Contacts

STUDY_CHAIRMarshall Medley

Sponsor GmbH

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 2, 2026