Skip to content

Low Level Laser VS Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Vascular Changes in Patients With Diabetic Polyneuropathy

Low Level Laser Versus Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Vascular Changes in Patients With Diabetic Polyneuropathy

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07078058
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-07-22
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
2025-12-01
Last updated
2025-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Level Laser, Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Brief summary

To compare the effect of both low-level laser versus transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on vascular changes in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy

Detailed description

Diabetic polyneuropathy is a prevalent and severe diabetes-related complication linked to cardiovascular mortality and disease events, even after accounting for risk factors and diabetes status. Diabetic polyneuropathy affects the peripheral nervous system, leading to dysfunctions in sensory, motor, and autonomic nervous systems. It predisposes diabetics to refractory neuropathic pain, foot ulcers, and amputation, lowering quality of life, increasing mortality, and prompting patients with diabetes to seek medical attention. Over half of diabetes patients experienced painful diabetic polyneuropathy over the past few decades Painful diabetic polyneuropathy therapy uses various drugs for symptom relief, but they often have systemic side effects and do not slow neuropathy progression. Therefore, investigating non-pharmacological interventions like low-level laser and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is crucial for developing more effective and potentially safer pain management options. low-level laser therapy and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation are emerging non-invasive interventions that have shown potential in alleviating pain associated with diabetic polyneuropathy, a common diabetes complication affecting quality of life. The effectiveness of conservative treatment options for painful diabetic polyneuropathy needs further investigation. If one method proves superior in reducing pain, improving macrovascular health, and quality of life, it could guide clinical decisions

Interventions

Patients in the low level laser group will be irradiated with visible and near-infra-red lasers at a pulsed mode with a frequency of 35 Hz, peak power of 100 mW, and a spot diameter of 5 mm. The 15-minute sessions were performed three times a week for two months, with each laser having a power density of 0.35 mW/cm2 and an energy density of 32.08 J/cm2.

DEVICETranscutaneous auricular Vagus nerve stimulation

Patients will receive 30 minutes of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation for 2 months, with 5 sessions per week. The antihelix and cymba concha will be sterilized with 75% alcohol, and the electrode will be attached. The device parameters include a wave width of 0.2 ms ± 30%, pulse frequency of 20 Hz, gradually increasing intensity to a tolerable intensity (4-6 mA), and duration of 30 minutes.

Sponsors

Horus University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The patient selection will be according to the following criteria: 1. 30 patients diagnosed with diabetic neuropathy from both genders their ages will be ranged from 45-60 years old. 2. All patients are ambulant independently. 3. All patients are under full medical control 4. Glycated hemoglobin is ranged from 6.5: 7 %. 5. Patients have had diabetes for more than 5 or 10 years. 6. patients experiencing painful peripheral neuropathic symptoms for more than 6 months involving both lower extremities and complained of burning pain with paresthesia in both legs. 7 Neurological examination revealed abnormal sensation appeared at the ends of the extremities.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients had unstable glycemic control and/or medical conditions that would confound assessment of neuropathy such as malignancy, active/untreated thyroid disease, peripheral vascular diseases, vascular insufficiency (claudication, skin discoloration, ulceration). 2. Following the implantation of cardiac pacemakers or other electrical stimulation devices. 3. Patient had sinus bradycardia, long QT syndrome, or other arrhythmias or mental disorders. 4. Patients whose heart rate dropped below 50 beats/min after vagus nerve stimulation. 5. Nerve damage as a result of prior reconstructive or replacement knee surgery, back surgery, spinal stenosis, spinal compression or radiculopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
assessment of change of vascular blood flowat baseline and after 8 weeksThe study uses Duplex Doppler ultrasound to assess vascular changes in the posterior tibial, anterior tibial, and peroneal arteries, assessing blood flow, Tunica intima thickness, and Resistive index using a variable frequency range.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of change of Neuropathic Painat baseline and after 8 weeksThe Douleur Neuropathique en 4 (DN4) is a screening questionnaire that consists of interview questions and physical tests to identify possible neuropathic pain. It has high test-retest and inter-rater reliability, with an ICC of 0.8 and a Cohen's kappa of 0.8. A total score is calculated as the sum of the 10 items. Scores \_ 4 out 10 of indicate that neuropathic pain is likely.
Assessment of change of Quality of lifeat baseline and after 8 weeksis a validated, comprehensive, self-administered questionnaire designed to measure the relationship between symptomatic DN and QOL from the perspective of the patient. The study used the Norfolk QOL-DN scoring algorithm to assess the quality of life of individuals. All symptom domain items were assigned a score, with items 31 and 32 scored on a 5-point Likert scale. Items 31 and 32 were scored on a scale of -2 to 2, with -2 indicating Much Better and -1 indicating Somewhat Better. The summation of scores was based on total quality of life, physical functioning/large fiber, ADLs, symptoms, small fiber, and autonomic. A higher score on the Norfolk QOL-DN indicates a poorer quality of life.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactManar Elbaz Mohamed nasr, Assistant lecturer
melbaz@horus.edu.eg01008805149

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026