Skip to content

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Novel Risk-Stratified Screening Strategy for Lung Cancer

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Novel Risk-Stratified Screening Strategy for Lung Cancer

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07078032
Enrollment
60000
Registered
2025-07-22
Start date
2025-07-31
Completion date
2028-11-30
Last updated
2025-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer Screening

Brief summary

A nationwide population-based multi-center RCT enrolling ≥60,000 eligible residents to compare screening effectiveness between risk-prediction-model-driven and traditional guideline-based high-risk lung cancer screening strategies.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTStandard Screening Arm

Participants are screened based on NCCN guideline criteria. High-risk individuals receive LDCT screening. Thoracic physicians guide management of screen-positive cases.

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTPrediction Model Arm

Lung cancer risk stratification via prediction model integrating: advanced age, lung cancer family history, personal cancer history, childhood coal exposure, asthma history, and food allergy history. High-risk individuals receive LDCT screening. Thoracic physicians guide management of screen-positive cases.

Sponsors

The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Residents with local household registration residing continuously in the region for ≥3 years. 2. Aged 40-74 years at enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Prior diagnosis of lung cancer (histologically/cytologically confirmed) 2. Currently receiving active treatment for any malignancy. 3. Presence of severe comorbidities with life expectancy \<5 years 4. Participation in any lung cancer screening program within 5 years. 5. Functional dependency (ADL score ≤2) OR unwillingness to comply with protocol-required follow-up. 6. Declined to provide written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of Screening StrategiesFrom enrollment through completion of diagnostic confirmation (up to 3 months post-screening)Proportion of true lung cancer cases among participants with positive screening results, confirmed by histopathology within 3 months after screening. Calculated as: (True Positives) / (True Positives + False Positives) × 100%. Assessed separately for both screening arms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specificity of Screening StrategiesFrom screening to 12-month follow-upProportion of cancer-free participants correctly identified as screening-negative. Calculated as: True Negatives / (True Negatives + False Positives) × 100%. Cancer-free status confirmed by 12-month follow-up
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)From screening to 12-month follow-upProportion of screening-negative participants without lung cancer. Calculated as: True Negatives / (True Negatives + False Negatives) × 100%. Absence of cancer confirmed by 12-month follow-up including LDCT and clinical evaluation.
Sensitivity of Screening StrategiesFrom screening to 12-month follow-upProportion of true lung cancer cases correctly identified by screening, confirmed through histopathology within 6 months. Calculated as: True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives) × 100%. Includes interval cancers detected within 12 months post-screening
Lung Cancer-Specific Mortality RateFrom randomization to 3-year follow-upDeath rate attributable to lung cancer, verified by independent mortality review committee using ICD-10 codes (C34.0-C34.9) and medical records. Expressed as deaths per 1,000 person-years.
Overall Survival in Screen-Detected Lung CancerFrom cancer diagnosis to 3-year follow-upTime from pathological diagnosis of lung cancer to death from any cause. Assessed using Kaplan-Meier method with censoring at last follow-up. Reported as median survival with 95% CI.
Early-Stage Shift ProportionAt time of cancer diagnosis (within 3 months post-positive screening)Percentage of screen-detected lung cancer cases diagnosed at early stage (AJCC 8th ed. Stage I-II) versus late stage (Stage III-IV). Calculated as: (Early-stage cases) / (Total screen-detected cases) × 100%.

Contacts

Primary ContactWenhua Liang professor, doctor
liangwh1987@163.com+86 020-83062808
Backup ContactHuiting Wang
wangh1805657064@163.com+86 15622132598

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026