Skip to content

Does Instrument-assisted Mobilization Influence Healthy, Short Achilles Tendons?

Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization Alters the Material and Mechanical Properties of Healthy, Shortened Achilles Tendons: a Within-subject Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07075172
Enrollment
18
Registered
2025-07-20
Start date
2013-10-03
Completion date
2014-10-16
Last updated
2025-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Achilles Tendon Length and Thickness, Healthy

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if instrumented-assisted soft tissue mobilization (i.e., massage using specialized metal instruments) of the lower leg and Achilles tendon region changes the properties of the tendon and the range of ankle dorsiflexion (i.e., the ability to bring the foot and toes back towards the head). One lower leg and Achilles tendon in each participant will be treated with instrumented-assisted soft tissue mobilization for 7 minutes during 8 treatment sessions over a 4-week period. The other lower leg and Achilles tendon will not be treated and be assessed as the non-treated control leg.

Detailed description

Tendons play a critical role in transferring muscle-generated forces to the skeleton for locomotion, but they are not solely force conveyors. Tendons also function as both mechanical buffers and power amplifiers. In their buffering role, tendons delay and slow muscle fascicle lengthening to dissipate energy during rapid negative work (i.e. eccentric contractions). However, it is in their role as power amplifiers that tendons have received most attention. Acting in a spring-like manner, tendons store elastic strain energy when stretched and return it when released to reduce the energy cost of motion. The amount of energy stored depends on a tendon's mechanical properties and, in particular, its stiffness. Stiffness represents the ability of a structure to resist deformation and is dependent upon both the quality of material present (i.e. amount and type) and how it is arranged (i.e. structure). Stiffer tendons may promote an improved ability to transmit muscle-generated forces resulting in improved performance. A stiffer tendon may also protect against injury. Tendons experience failure in a relatively set strain (i.e. elongation) range. A stiffer tendon experiences less strain per unit of applied force and, thus, can withstand greater load before reaching damage-inducing strains. It is now accepted tendons adapt their stiffness (among other properties) to their environment. Tendon stiffness declines with disuse, pathology (i.e. tendinopathy) and aging. Conversely, systematic reviews have demonstrated tendon stiffness increases in response to heightened levels of physical activity, with a preference toward high intensity loads (i.e. \>70% maximum voluntary contraction or repetition maximum). However, beyond physical activity there are limited clinically available modalities to positively influence tendon stiffness. For instance, vibration and stretching interventions have not been shown to impact tendon stiffness or even cause it to decline. A modality that may modulate tendon stiffness is instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM). IASTM is a popular alternative to traditional manual therapy techniques and involves the use of specialized hard tools to apply controlled, localized mechanical loads to soft connective tissues. Initial preclinical animal studies reported IASTM altered fibroblast recruitment and activation after chemically-induced tendon injury, and improved tissue perfusion and mechanical recovery following surgically-induced ligament injury. Clinically, there is emerging but limited and low-quality evidence of the efficacy of IASTM in improving range of motion, pain and patient-reported outcomes. With regards to tissue stiffness, studies have reported single IASTM treatments targeting muscle to have no effect on musculotendinous shear modulus or stiffness, and to reduce or have no effect on passively assessed joint stiffness. To our knowledge, no study has reported a beneficial effect of IASTM on tendon mechanical and material properties, with Ikeda et al. reporting that IASTM self-administered over 6-weeks to the posterior lower leg had no impact on Achilles tendon (AT) shear modulus assessed using shear wave elastography. The primary aim of the current study is to explore the effect of IASTM administered to the posterior lower leg and Achilles tendon twice per week for 4 weeks on the material and mechanical properties of the tendon in healthy subjects with reduced tendon length. A secondary aim is to investigate the impact of IASTM applied to the AT on range of ankle dorsiflexion, assessed using the weight bearing lunge ('lunge') test. The study will implement a within-subject controlled design wherein one leg received IASTM and the contralateral leg served as a non-IASTM treated internal control. Both sides will be equally exposed to warm-up and stretching activities within each treatment session.

Interventions

OTHERInstrumented-assisted soft tissue mobilization

Instrumented-assisted soft tissue mobilization of the posterior leg and Achilles tendon region

Sponsors

Indiana University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Within-subject controlled study. One side of the body is treated with the other side being an internal non-treated control site.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* The distance from the tip of the great toe to the wall during the weightbearing lunge test is \<90 mm bilaterally with ≤15 mm asymmetry * A stretch sensation is reported in the region of the Achilles tendon during the weightbearing lunge test

Exclusion criteria

* A history of Achilles tendon injury, pain, rupture or surgery * Current pain in the heel, foot or ankle * Surgery in the past 12 months to the foot, heel or ankle * A sensation other than a stretch within the Achilles tendon region during the weightbearing lunge test (e.g. compression/pinching in the vicinity of the anterior talocrural joint or a more vague, deeper stretch within the vicinity of the posterior talocrural joint).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the stiffness of the Achilles tendon measured using ultrasoundFrom enrollment until 6 days after the end of treatment at 4 weeksParticipants will push their foot against a force measuring platform. At the same time, an ultrasound will be used to image their Achilles tendon. How much force they generated will be divided by how far the tendon stretches to indicate stiffness in newtons per millimeter (N/mm)
Change in the modulus of the Achilles tendon measured using ultrasoundFrom enrollment until 6 days after the end of treatment at 4 weeksParticipants will push their foot against a force measuring platform. At the same time, an ultrasound will be used to image their Achilles tendon. How much force they generated will be divided by how far the tendon stretches to indicate stiffness in newtons per millimeter (N/mm). The stiffness will be divided by the cross sectional area of the tendon to indicate modulus in megaPascals (MPa).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of motion of ankle dorsiflexionFrom enrollment until 6 days after the end of treatment at 4 weeksAssessed using the weightbearing lunge test

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026