Skip to content

NOL-Guided vs Conventional Intraoperative Opioid Infusion on Outcomes in Geriatric Patients

Effect of NOL-Guided vs Conventional Intraoperative Opioid Infusion on Outcomes in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Lumbar Stabilization Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07075003
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-07-20
Start date
2025-07-31
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2025-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Geriatric Anesthesia, Opioid Use, Pain

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of conventional methods and goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring on total remifentanil dosage, wake-up time, and complications in geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery.

Detailed description

With the aging population, the number of geriatric patients undergoing surgery is increasing daily. One of the anesthesiologists' main responsibilities is to prevent intraoperative pain and related complications. Opioids have been known for thousands of years as valuable tools for pain management and remain the cornerstone of perioperative analgesia today (1). Remifentanil is currently the most commonly used opioid during the intraoperative period due to its potent analgesic properties, short duration of action, and metabolism by plasma enzymes. While it may improve hemodynamic stability, remifentanil can also cause hypotension and bradycardia. Prolonged remifentanil use may lead to hyperalgesia, increasing the need for postoperative opioid analgesics and consequently leading to opioid-related side effects. In elderly patients, changes in body composition, drug sensitivity, and hepatic/renal metabolism require more cautious opioid administration. Optimizing remifentanil infusion dosing during surgery may reduce total opioid consumption and thus decrease side effects such as wake-up time, postoperative pain, and nausea. In conventional use, remifentanil is administered as a continuous infusion, and dosage adjustments are made based on heart rate and blood pressure changes to estimate pain levels. However, with goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring, more effective analgesia can be achieved. These applications are selected based on the clinician's experience and preferences. While some publications report that total remifentanil use decreases in patients with dose adjustments guided by pain monitoring, evidence is lacking regarding which method is superior in terms of patient outcomes in elderly populations.The aim of this study is to compare the effects of conventional methods and goal-directed therapy guided by pain monitoring on total remifentanil dosage, wake-up time, and complications in geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery. After obtaining informed consent, a total of 80 geriatric patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery will be included. Once on the operating table, all patients will receive standard monitoring including peripheral oxygen saturation, non-invasive blood pressure, ECG, and anesthesia depth. All patients will receive intravenous 2-2.5 mg/kg propofol under Sedline guidance, and remifentanil via target-controlled infusion at an effect-site concentration of 4 ng/ml. After anesthesia depth falls below 50, 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium will be administered. Maintenance anesthesia will be with 1-2% sevoflurane in 40/60% oxygen/air mixture at 2 L flow. The method of remifentanil administration will be determined by the attending anesthesiologist. Demographic data (age, height, weight, gender, comorbidities, ASA score) will be recorded. Hemodynamic parameters (blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal CO₂), remifentanil dosage, and NOL levels (for Group 2) will be recorded every 15 minutes during the surgery. At the end of surgery, the following will be documented: Total remifentanil dosage Blood loss and transfusion volume Number of hypotensive events (MAP \<55) Wake-up time Total surgical time NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) pain scores Nausea-vomiting scores In the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), pain and nausea-vomiting scores will be evaluated at the 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, along with duration of PACU stay. During ward follow-up, pain scores, nausea-vomiting scores, administered medications, and length of postoperative hospital stay will be recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 24 hours. Nausea-vomiting will be assessed using a 4-point scale: 0: none 1. nausea without vomiting 2. nausea with vomiting 3. vomiting more than twice Pain will be assessed using the NRS scale.

Interventions

DEVICEnociceptive level

remifentanil infusion dose adjustment according to the changes of nociceptive level

Sponsors

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to 90 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing lumbar stabilization surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Chronic opioid use * Severe congestive heart failıure * Severe arrhythmia * Uncontrolled hypertension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total doseoperation durationTotal dose of remifentanil used in operation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative painpostoperative 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, 1, 3, 6, and 24 hourspain evaluation during postoperative 24 hour, 11 point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) will be used to measure pain level (0-10) 0: No pain, 10: Worst possible pain
nausea and vomitingpostoperative 10th, 20th, and 30th minutes, 1, 3, 6, and 24 hourspostoperative nausea and vomiting Nausea-vomiting will be assessed using a 4-point scale: 0: none 1. nausea without vomiting 2. nausea with vomiting 3. vomiting more than twice

Contacts

Primary ContactSüheyla Abitağaoğlu
suheylaatay81@gmail.com05325267656

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026