Skip to content

Effect of Electromagnetic Field Therapy and Customized Foot Insole on Peripheral Circulation and Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Head of Department of Physical Therapy for Cardiovascular/Respiratory Disorders and Geriatrics

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07070544
Enrollment
79
Registered
2025-07-17
Start date
2025-08-01
Completion date
2026-01-01
Last updated
2025-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Keywords

Effect of Electromagnetic Field Therapy, Customized Foot Insole, Peripheral Circulation, Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index

Brief summary

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, associated with poor peripheral circulation, neuropathy, and increased risk of lower-limb amputation. Optimizing peripheral blood flow is critical in the prevention and management of DFUs. Traditional offloading strategies, such as customized foot insoles, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing plantar pressure and promoting ulcer healing. Electromagnetic field (EMF) therapy is a non-invasive modality that has shown potential in enhancing microcirculation, promoting angiogenesis, and modulating inflammatory processes. Preliminary studies have suggested that EMF may improve peripheral circulation and tissue oxygenation in diabetic patients. This study aims to investigate the combined effect of EMF therapy and customized foot insoles on peripheral circulation and Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) in patients with diabetic foot ulcers, hypothesizing that this integrated approach may yield superior outcomes compared to standard care.

Detailed description

2\. Objectives Primary Objective: • To evaluate the effect of EMF therapy combined with customized foot insoles on peripheral circulation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Secondary Objective: * To assess changes in Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) following intervention. * To compare the ulcer healing rates and pain levels between intervention and control groups. 3\. Research Questions 1. Does the combination of EMF therapy and customized foot insoles improve peripheral circulation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers? 2. Is there a significant improvement in ABPI in the intervention group compared to control? 3. What is the effect of the intervention on ulcer healing rates and pain reduction? \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ 4. Hypotheses * H1: EMF therapy combined with customized foot insoles significantly improves peripheral circulation compared to standard care. * H2: EMF therapy combined with customized foot insoles significantly improves ABPI in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

Interventions

DEVICEElectromagnetic Field Therapy: • Frequency: 50 Hz • Intensity: 5-30 mT • Duration: 30 minutes/session • Frequency: 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks Customized Foot Insoles: • Individually tailored based on

Electromagnetic Field Therapy: * Frequency: 50 Hz * Intensity: 5-30 mT * Duration: 30 minutes/session * Frequency: 3 sessions/week for 8 weeks Customized Foot Insoles: * Individually tailored based on foot pressure mapping and deformity. * Designed to offload pressure points and support foot arches. Standard Care: • Wound care, glycemic control, and patient education as per institutional protocol.

Sponsors

South Valley University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* • Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. * Presence of unilateral or bilateral diabetic foot ulcer. * ABPI between 0.6 - 1.0 (mild to moderate arterial insufficiency).

Exclusion criteria

* • Severe peripheral arterial disease (ABPI \<0.5). * Active infection requiring hospitalization. * History of amputation. * Cardiac pacemaker or contraindication to EMF therapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Blood flowMeasurement Timeline: • Minimum value (Baseline)(Week 0) • Mid-intervention (Week 4) • Maximum value (Post-intervention) (Week 8) • Follow-up (Week 12)Primary Outcome: • Peripheral Circulation: Assessed by Laser Doppler Flowmetry and/or skin perfusion pressure (SPP).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
• Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI)Measurement Timeline: • Minimum value (Baseline) (Week 0) • Mid-intervention (Week 4) • Maximum value (Post-intervention) (Week 8) • Follow-up (Week 12)• Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI): Measured using handheld Doppler.
• Ulcer Healing RateMeasurement Timeline: • Minimum value (Baseline) (Week 0) • Mid-intervention (Week 4) • Maximum value (Post-intervention) (Week 8) • Follow-up (Week 12)• Ulcer Healing Rate: Monitored through ulcer size reduction (planimetric tracing and digital photography).
• Pain Level:Measurement Timeline: • Minimum value (Baseline) (Week 0) • Mid-intervention (Week 4) • Maximum value (Post-intervention) (Week 8) • Follow-up (Week 12)• Pain Level: Measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Contacts

Primary Contactibrahim ismail Abuzaid, PhD
ibrahim_ismail_2011@svu.edu.eg+962777956592

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026