Skip to content

Comparing Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization With Positional Release Technique for Plantar Fasciitis Pain and Range of Motion

Comparing Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization With Positional Release Technique for Plantar Fasciitis Pain and Range of Motion

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07070245
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-07-17
Start date
2025-06-22
Completion date
2025-10-01
Last updated
2025-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Plantar Fasciitis, Heel Pain, Plantar Fascia Inflammation

Keywords

Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization, Chronic plantar fasciitis, Positional release technique

Brief summary

Chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) is the most common cause of chronic heel pain in adults, affecting both young active patients and older, more sedentary individuals. It results from chronic overload of the plantar fascia. This overload may be due to overuse, as seen in runners and military personnel, or due to excessive loading in individuals with obesity (body mass index \>30), sedentary lifestyles, or occupations that require prolonged standing.

Interventions

PROCEDUREInstrument assisted soft tissue mobilization

The treatment protocol will be two sessions. given per week for 4 weeks.

The treatment protocol will be two sessions. given per week for 4 weeks.

PROCEDUREExercises

The treatment protocol will be two sessions. given per week for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Doaa Said Mohamed Ibrahim
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Clinically diagnosed cases of plantar fasciitis not less than 3 months. 2. Heel pain felt maximally over plantar aspect of heel. 3. Pain in the heel on the first step in the morning. 4. Their age ranging from 30 to 50 years

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects can't tolerate close physical contact (Kotwalkar et al., 2019). 2. Athletes. 3. Subjects with skin infections (Kotwalkar et al., 2019). 4. Subjects with recent fracture with incomplete bony union (Rowlett et al., 2018). 5. Subjects with acute inflammatory or infectious process (Rowlett et al., 2018). 6. Subjects with hematoma (Rowlett et al., 2018). 7. Subjects with osteoporosis (Looney et al., 2011). 8. Subjects with foot deformity (Kotwalkar et al., 2019). 9. Subjects that take medications that may increase blood clotting (Kotwalkar et al., 2019). 10. Surgery to the ankle or foot (Looney et al., 2011).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity level assessed by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Baseline and after 8 sessions (approximately 4 weeks)Pain intensity level assessed by Numeric Pain Rating Scale. A scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Range of motionBaseline and after 8 sessions (approximately 4 weeks)A digital goniometer is used for the assessment of ankle dorsiflexion, plantar flexion range of motion, and knee flexion range of motion.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026