Perilunate Dislocation
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of the research study is to determine the overall clinical and radiographic outcome differences between internal brace technique and the gold standard Kirschner wires (K-wire) technique for treatment of perilunate dislocations (e.g. nonunion, reoperation, infection, fixation failure, etc.). A secondary purpose is to determine the specific types of complications and their incidence rates with respect to internal brace technique and the gold standard Kirschner wires (K-wire) technique (e.g. range of motion losses, pain, numbness, weakness, etc).
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Skeletally mature patients who have undergone surgical fixation of perilunate dislocation
Exclusion criteria
* Perilunate dislocations with concomitant carpal fracture(s) * Pediatric patients (Age \< 18 years-old) * Patients whose age is greater than or equal to 89 years * History of previous perilunate dislocation on ipsilateral side
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Functional Assessment | From enrollment to 2-years postoperative | assessment to measure wrist flexion/extension (degrees), wrist flexion/extension arc (degrees), and composite wrist function |
| Quick DASH Form | From enrollment to 2-years postoperative | Assessment of symptoms and ability to perform certain activities. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Specific types of complications and their incidence rates | From enrollment to 2-years postoperative | Determine the specific types of complications and their incidence rates with respect to internal brace technique and the gold standard Kirschner wires (K-wire) technique (e.g. range of motion losses, pain, paresthesias, weakness, etc.). |
Countries
United States