Skip to content

Thickness Map-Guided vs. Empirical PV Isolation Using Pulsed Field Ablation for Paroxysmal AF

Computed Tomogram Myocardial Thickness Map-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation vs. Empirical Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Pulse-Field Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (UTMOST AF III)

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07068646
Enrollment
298
Registered
2025-07-16
Start date
2025-08-31
Completion date
2029-07-31
Last updated
2025-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing CT-guided versus empirical pulsed field ablation (PFA) for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The study investigates whether atrial wall thickness-based energy titration improves arrhythmia outcomes compared to standard empirical ablation using the PulseSelect™ system.

Detailed description

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an effective and increasingly adopted strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, current empirical lesion protocols do not account for patient-specific anatomical variability, particularly atrial wall thickness, which may influence lesion durability. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether a CT-guided ablation strategy-using pre-procedural atrial wall thickness maps to titrate lesion application-can improve rhythm outcomes compared to standard empirical PFA. A total of 298 patients will be enrolled and randomized to either the CT-guided or empirical group, with follow-up over 12 months to assess freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence and procedure-related safety outcomes.

Interventions

Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the PulseSelect™ pulsed field ablation system. A pre-procedural cardiac CT scan will be used to generate an atrial myocardial thickness map. In this group, atrial segments with wall thickness \>2.5 mm identified on the CT map will receive additional PFA applications (up to 8 per PV) to ensure transmural lesion formation. All other segments will receive the standard minimum of 8 applications per vein. The ablation catheter will remain stationary to allow lesion stacking when needed.

Pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using the PulseSelect™ pulsed field ablation system according to a standardized empirical protocol. Each pulmonary vein will receive a minimum of 8 PFA applications without adjustment based on anatomical or CT-based parameters. Additional applications may be delivered at the operator's discretion based on procedural findings, but no wall thickness mapping will be used.

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation who is scheduled for ablation procedure and ≥19 and ≤80 years of age * Left atrium size \< 50mm * paroxysmal atrial fibrillation that is recurrence during antiarrhythmic drug treatment or is not able to use an antiarrhythmic drug. * Patient who is indicated for anticoagulation therapy (for prevention of cerebral infarction)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation * Atrial fibrillation associated with severe cardiac malformation or a structural heart disease that is hemodynamically affected * Patients with severe renal impairment or CT imaging difficulty using contrast media * Patients with a past history of radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation or other cardiac surgery * Patients with active internal bleeding * Patients with contraindications for anticoagulation therapy(for prevention of cerebral infarction) and antiarrhythmic drugs * Patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (mitral stenosis \>grade 2, mechanical valve, mitral valvuloplasty) * Patients with a severe comorbid disease * Expected survival \< 1 year * Drug addicts or alcoholics * Patients who cannot read the consent form (illiterates, foreigners, etc.) * Other patients who are judged by the principal or sub-investigator to be ineligible for participation in this clinical study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrenceWithin 1 year after 3 months of procedureAny documented episode of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting ≥30 seconds after a 3-month blanking period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure-related cardiac complication rate30 days after procedureOpen cardiac surgery, cerebral infarction, pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade, hematoma in the inguinal puncture site and vascular complications

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026