Skip to content

Weaning Approaches for Vasopressin in Sepsis

Weaning Approaches for Vasopressin in Sepsis - a Randomized Controlled Trial of Titrated Versus Abrupt Discontinuation During Stabilization of Septic Shock - WAVES Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07067866
Acronym
WAVES
Enrollment
82
Registered
2025-07-16
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2028-10-01
Last updated
2026-01-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Keywords

vasopressin, septic shock, vasopressor weaning

Brief summary

In this study, we aim to evaluate the incidence of hypotension during vasopressin weaning by comparing two methods - titrated reduction versus abrupt withdrawal - through the conduct of a randomized clinical trial.

Detailed description

Catecholamine infusions are usually tapered gradually in a titrated manner. However, little is known about how to manage adjunctive therapies such as vasopressin. While catecholamines have a short half-life (2-3 minutes), vasopressin's half-life ranges from 10 to 20 minutes. Although endogenous vasopressin levels are depleted in the early phase of shock, they are restored during recovery. Given its pharmacokinetic profile and the endogenous dynamics across different phases of shock, the optimal approach to vasopressin withdrawal - whether titrated or abrupt - remains unclear. In 2021, a study was published comparing abrupt versus gradual vasopressin discontinuation. This was a retrospective observational study including 1,318 patients. Using ICU length of stay as the primary outcome, no significant difference was observed between groups (abrupt discontinuation: 7.9 days; gradual discontinuation: 7.3 days; p = 0.6). Similarly, there was no difference in the incidence of clinically significant hypotension (abrupt: 39.7%; gradual: 41.7%; p = 0.53). However, when stratifying patients based on whether catecholamine infusions were still ongoing at the time of vasopressin discontinuation, the results reversed in terms of ICU stay (abrupt: 9.2 days; gradual: 7.6 days), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.24). In 2023, another retrospective observational study was published comparing abrupt versus gradual vasopressin withdrawal, including 74 patients. No difference was found in the incidence of clinically significant hypotension (abrupt: 57.1%; gradual: 52.3%; p = 0.68), nor in ICU length of stay. It is important to note, however, that in this cohort only patients who had already discontinued catecholamines prior to vasopressin withdrawal were included.

Interventions

OTHERTitrated weaning of vasopressin.

The titrated group will follow the vasopressin weaning protocol used in the DOVSS study (reduction of 0.01 U/min per hour).

OTHERAbrupt weaning of vasopressin.

The abrupt group will discontinue the vasopressin infusion at the time of randomization, without dose titration.

Sponsors

Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age over 18 years * Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit * Patients with vasopressor dependent sepsis * Receiving combined norepinephrine and vasopressin therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Withdrawal/reduction of vasopressin related to a plan of treatment limitation or palliative care * Withdrawal/reduction of vasopressin associated with the initiation of adrenaline or any other vasopressor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypotension within the first 24 hours24 hoursIncidence of hypotension with clinical repercussions within the first 24 hours after titrated reduction or abrupt withdrawal of vasopressin. Definition of hypotension with clinical repercussions: mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg, leading to: * administration of crystalloid/colloid bolus and/or * increase in norepinephrine dose and/or * reinitiation or increase in vasopressin dose.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypotension within the first hourFirst hourIncidence of hypotension with clinical repercussions within the first hour after titrated reduction or abrupt withdrawal of vasopressin. Definition of hypotension with clinical repercussions: mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg, leading to: * administration of crystalloid/colloid bolus and/or * increase in norepinephrine dose and/or * reinitiation or increase in vasopressin dose.
Vasopressor-free days7 daysNumber of days a patient is alive and free of vasopressor between randomization and day 7. Non-survivors will be considered to have zero vasopressor-free days.
Vasopressin-free days7 daysNumber of days a patient is alive and free of vasopressin between randomization and day 7. Non-survivors will be considered to have zero vasopressin-free days.
Renal replacement therapy7 daysInitiation of hemodialysis between randomization and day 7, excluding chronic dialysis patients.
Hypotension stratified according to vasopressin duration24 hoursIncidence of hypotension with clinical repercussions within the first 24 hours after titrated reduction or abrupt withdrawal of vasopressin, stratified according to vasopressin duration: \< 48 hours ≥ 48 hours Definition of hypotension with clinical repercussions: mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg, leading to: * administration of crystalloid/colloid bolus and/or * increase in norepinephrine dose and/or * reinitiation or increase in vasopressin dose.
ICU-free days28 daysNumber of days a patient is alive and outside the ICU between randomization and day 28. Non-survivors will be considered to have zero ICU-free days.
Ischemic events28 daysOccurrence of mesenteric ischemia, ischemic stroke, digital ischemia and acute coronary syndrome between randomization and day 28.
All-cause mortality28 daysAll-cause mortality within 28 days after randomization.
Cardiac arrhythmias7 daysIncidence of arrhythmias with hemodynamic consequences between randomization and day 7, defined as hemodynamic deterioration requiring electrical or chemical cardioversion.

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactWagner Luis Nedel, Critical Care Physician, PhD
wagnernedel@gmail.com55 51 999547554
Backup ContactRafael Barberena Moraes, Critical Care Physician, PhD
rbmoraes@hcpa.edu.br55 51 996971855

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026