Shaft Femure Fracture in Adolescents
Conditions
Brief summary
The aim of this study is to compare the * functional outcomes, fracture healing time, rate of complications, and long-term growth outcomes between intramedullary nail and plating in adolescent. * Assess radiographic outcomes (e.g., alignment, limb length discrepancy, and growth plate disturbance). * Evaluate complications such as infection, nonunion, malunion, refractures, and need for reoperation (e.g., hardware removal).
Detailed description
Elastic Nails (EN) are flexible intramedullary devices, usually made of titanium or stainless steel, that allow for dynamic stabilization. They are typically used for fractures in children and adolescents. The intramedullary nails offer the advantage of minimally invasive insertion, less disruption of the periosteum, and potential for less disruption of the growth plate.The nails bend and allow for some motion at the fracture site, which promotes healing through the formation of callus. Plate fixation typically involves a compression or neutralization plate, usually a dynamic compression plate (DCP) or a locking plate. This method provides rigid stabilization but often requires more extensive dissection and can interfere with growth if the plate is applied too close to the physis (growth plate).While plating can be very effective in providing stability, there is a higher risk of complications such as hardware-related issues (e.g., plate prominence, need for removal) and potential growth disturbances.
Interventions
DEVICEintramedullary nails for group A
fixation of the shaft femure fracture in this group by intramedullary nails
DEVICEplate for group B
fixation of the shaft femure fracture in the group b by plates
Sponsors
Sohag University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 16 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age: 10-16 years (skeletally immature, based on radiographic evidence of growth plates). * Diagnosis: Closed or open (Grade I) diaphyseal femoral fractures. * Fracture type: Simple transverse, short oblique, or spiral fractures (classified by the AO/OTA system or by the Müller classification).
Exclusion criteria
* • Fractures with significant comminution or open fractures (Grade II or III). * Pathological fractures (e.g., secondary to bone disease). * Severe systemic conditions that may affect bone healing or postoperative recovery (e.g., metabolic bone diseases). * Patients with previous ipsilateral femur fractures or those requiring re-operation for non-union or malunion.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fracture Femure fixation by intramedullary nails versus plates | 6 months | limb length discrepancy by planning X rays. |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactMohamed Hashem Ahmed, master
Outcome results
None listed