Skip to content

Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy (ESWT) vs Phytotherapy vs Combined in Treatment of Chronic Prostatitis

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Combined Extracorporeal Shock- Wave Therapy (ESWT) With Phytotherapy Versus Each of Them Alone in Chronic Prostatitis Category ⅢB

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07066735
Enrollment
90
Registered
2025-07-15
Start date
2025-07-20
Completion date
2026-03-01
Last updated
2025-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Prostatitis (CP)

Keywords

Chronic prostatitis, ESWT, Phytotherapy, LUTS

Brief summary

to compare the efficacy and safety of ESWT combined with phytotherapy, ESWT alone and phytotherapy alone in treatment of chronic prostatitis.

Detailed description

In this study the investigators will conduct a Prospective randomized clinical trial, patients will be randomized to 3 groups where they will use use radial waves device (INTELECT RPW SHOCKWAVE) By Chattanooga for ESWT. Another group will receive Phytothyrapy that will be capsules containing powder extract of saw palmetto , tomato , uvaursi , pygeum and pumpkin. while the last group will receive both.

Interventions

DEVICEESWT

Transperineal Shockwaves that are applied once a week for 8 consecutive weeks with a protocol of 3000 pulses each; pressure: 1.8-2.0 bar and a frequency of 10 Hertz (Hz)

DRUGPhytotherapy that contains powder extract of (saw palmetto , tomato , uva ursi , pygeum and pumpkin

1capsule tob be taken twice daily for one month.

Sponsors

Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Perineal or pelvic pain or discomfort of at least 3 months * NIH-CPSI total score greater than 15, * Negative semen cultures for bacteria.

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of bacteria in seminal culture tests, * Urinary stones, * Uncontrolled coagulopathy, * Chronic bacterial prostatitis, * Bladder and prostate cancer, * Medications that could affect lower urinary tract function during the last month * Serum prostate-specific antigen levels (PSA) more than 4 ng/mL * History of prostate surgery or radiotherapy * Perineal anatomical abnormalities * Neurological abnormalities. * Previous extensive pelvic injuries

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
compare the degree of symptoms relief between the three groupspre intervenon, at 4 and 8 weeks post intervention and at 2 and 4 months post intervention.using National Institutes of Health-developed Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIHCPSI) that will be filled by the patients pre and post intervention at 4 weeks and 8 weeks, 2 and 4 months. It comprises three key domains: pain (scored from 0 to 21), urinary symptoms (0 to 10), and the impact on quality of life (0 to 12), with a total score range spanning from 0 to 43. Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms and a worse overall outcome, while lower scores indicate milder symptoms and a better clinical picture. Severity is typically interpreted as mild (0-9), moderate (10-18), severe (19-31), and very severe (32-43), making the scale valuable for both diagnosis and monitoring treatment progress.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactYounan R. Samir, lecturer
dr_yona@live.com00201201255511
Backup ContactWalid E. Mousa, Assisstant Professor
waleedmousa2@yahoo.com00201067628771

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026