Skip to content

Clinical Performance and Remineralization Potential of Self- Assembling Peptide P11-4 Containing Fluoride Versus Er, Cr: YSGG Laser Treatment and Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Giomer Restoration in Carious Lesions

Clinical Performance and Remineralization Potential of Self- Assembling Peptide P11-4 Containing Fluoride Versus Er, Cr: YSGG Laser Treatment and Micro Tensile Bond Strength of Giomer Restoration in Carious Lesions

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07065305
Enrollment
21
Registered
2025-07-15
Start date
2025-09-15
Completion date
2026-09-15
Last updated
2025-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dentin Caries, Remineralization Potential

Keywords

Er, Cr: YSGG Laser, Caries-Affected Dentin, Remineralization Potential, Self-Assembling Peptide P11-4 Containing Fluoride

Brief summary

This study will be performed in two parts, in vivo and in vitro to assess the effect of the remineralization potential of self-assembling peptide P11-4 containing Fluoride on caries-affected dentin compared to untreated caries-affected dentin and the influence of Er, Cr: YSGG Laser treatment.

Detailed description

The present study will be performed to evaluate the remineralization potential of the self-assembling peptide P11-4 combined with fluoride treatment applied over demineralized dentin in occlusal carious molars. * Research objectives: To assess the effect of the two treatment modalities to enhance remineralization of demineralized dentin and clinical performance of restorations. * Research question: Will pretreatment of caries affected dentin using self-assembling peptide P11-4 containing fluoride compared to untreated caries-affected dentin will enhance the remineralization and clinical performance of composite restorations In Vitro Study 1- The present study will be performed to evaluate the remineralization potential of the self-assembling peptide P11-4 combined with fluoride and its effect on bond strength and analyze morphological changes over demineralized dentin in occlusal carious molars using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). * Research Objectives: To evaluate the effect of Curodont Repair Fluoride Plus and Er,Cr:YSGG laser pretreatment on the bond strength of composite resin to superficial and deep dentin. * Research question: Will pretreatment of caries affected dentin using self-assembling peptide P11-4 containing fluoride compared to untreated caries-affected dentin will enhance bond strength?

Interventions

DRUGCurodont Repair Fluoride Plus (Self-assembling peptide remineralization agent)P11-4 peptide, fluoride, mild acidic buffer (pH ~4.5) , Credentis AG, Switzerland

Pretreatment with Curodont Repair Fluoride Plus (P11-4 + fluoride)

Application of Giomer restorative material following standard adhesive procedures without pretreatment.

Sponsors

Al-Azhar University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

* Eligible patients will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control group using computer-generated random numbers. * Allocation concealment will be ensured using sealed opaque envelopes. * Clinical evaluators assessing outcomes will be blinded to the group allocation to reduce bias.

Intervention model description

* Group 1 no pretreatment will received. * Group 2 will receive Curodont Repair (P11-4 plus fluoride).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* o Patients aged (20 - 40) years. * Presence of at least one posterior permanent molar with an occlusal carious lesion classified as ICDAS code 3 or 4 requiring operative treatment. * Good general and oral health. * Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* o Patients with systemic conditions affecting oral health or healing. * Teeth with pulp involvement or periapical pathology. * Allergy to study materials. * Poor oral hygiene or periodontal disease in the target tooth region.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Marginal integrity of restorations6 months and 12 monthsAssessed using mirror and probe according to Modified USPHS Criteria
Clinical longevity of restorations6 and 12 monthsAssessed by restoration retention using mirror and probe
Overall clinical performance of restorations6 and 12 monthsEvaluated using Modified USPHS Criteria

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surface roughness6 and 12 monthsEvaluated using digital photographic method
Postoperative hypersensitivity6 and 12 monthsEvaluated using cold spray test
Surface luster6 and 12 monthsAssessed using digital photographic method
Marginal discoloration6 and 12 monthsAssessed using digital photographic method
Recurrent caries6 and 12 monthsDetected using digital photographic method

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026