Skip to content

sTMS Combined With CIMT and taVNS In Infants With Hemiplegia

Integrating Corticospinal Tract Assessment Via sTMS And taVNS-Augmented CIMT In Infants With Hemiplegia

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07063446
Enrollment
10
Registered
2025-07-14
Start date
2025-11-07
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemiplegia, Perinatal Brain Injury

Keywords

constraint induced movement therapy, infants, taVNS, sTMS, hemiplegia

Brief summary

Preterm and term infants with brain injury frequently have delayed motor skills, and one hand and arm may become stronger than the other, which can signal early cerebral palsy. A new treatment, transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), boosts specific brain circuits and may improve function when paired with intensive motor activities. This study will test taVNS-paired constraint induced movement therapy in infants who have greater weakness on one side and determine if a single pulse of transcranial brain stimulation over the motor area can cause a measurable movement of the hand or thumb, and indicate which infants can benefit from 40h taVNS-paired CIMT.

Detailed description

One of the most effective early therapies for improving motor skills in infants with unilateral motor weakness after perinatal brain injury, is constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT), in which a therapist engages a child in targeted play therapy with the more-affected arm/hand while the less-affected arm is immobilized in a mitt, reinforcing activity-dependent neuroplasticity. taVNS may accelerate functional gains and boost CIMT effects in young infants with hemiplegia over CIMT alone, based on pilot data. Before embarking on a larger scale trial, single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) will be used to determine the connectivity and strength of the cortical spinal tract motor circuit with motor evoked potential of the hand or thumb. The hypothesis is that the ability to respond to taVNS paired with intensive motor skill therapy in hemiplegic infants may be predicted by motor evoked potentials (MEP) elicited from sTMS over the motor cortex, as a quantifiable biomarker of CST circuit integrity, circuit response and cortical excitability.

Interventions

DEVICEsTMS

Single pulses of TMS will be delivered over the motor cortex to quantify and map the motor evoked potentials

DEVICEtaVNS

taVNS will be used to stimulate the auricular branch of the vagus nerve and paired with CIMT for a total of 40hours of CIMT

Sponsors

Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The trial is designed to use a diagnostic device prior to using an experimental treatment device paired with non-experimental physical therapy (CIMT).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Months to 24 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infants 8-24mo with hemiplegia or asymmetric weakness of one arm, with or without truncal and transitional motor delays * Gross Motor function Classification system (GMFCS) I - IV * Parents are able to make consecutive appointments for assessments and intervention over 2wks and complete the 3mo follow-up. * Parents are willing to fill out developmental questionnaires and provide the study team feedback on tolerability and outcomes.

Exclusion criteria

* previous CIMT within 3 months * GMFCS V or severe motor impairment/quadriplegia * uncorrected blindness/deafness, cardiomyopathy * poorly controlled seizure disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assisted Hand Assessment3monthsPercent Change in the mini-AHA or AHA from baseline to end of treatment- the standardized scale on the Assisted hand assessments range from 0-100 where 100 indicates greatest possible functional use of the hand and 0 indicates no hand function
Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)3 monthsPresence or absence (+ or -) of MEP in the affected upper extremity in response to sTMS of primary motor cortex in both hemispheres (circuit analysis)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
GMFM-883 monthsPercent Change in scores of Gross motor function measure-88 from baseline to end of treatment; total raw scores range from 0-264, with higher scores indicating greater motor function

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactDorothea Jenkins, MD
jenkd@mus.edu843-792-2112
Backup ContactCynthia Dodds, PT PhD
doddscb@musc.edu843- 792-5731

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026