Skip to content

Contrast Compression Therapy for Post-Stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Effectiveness of Contrast Compression Therapy for Post-Stroke Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07062913
Enrollment
72
Registered
2025-07-14
Start date
2021-11-01
Completion date
2023-01-09
Last updated
2025-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Hemiplegia, Stroke

Keywords

Stroke, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Contrast Compression Therapy, Hemiplegia, Neurorehabilitation

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of contrast compression therapy as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation in patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following stroke. Post-stroke CRPS, previously known as shoulder-hand syndrome, is a challenging condition that affects upper extremity function and quality of life. Although various conservative treatments such as medication, physical therapy, and contrast water therapy have been used with varying success, evidence for standardized protocols remains limited. In this prospective, single-center, single-blind, randomized controlled trial, eligible patients with post-stroke CRPS type I were randomly assigned to receive either conventional rehabilitation alone or combined with contrast compression therapy. The intervention included 10 sessions of sequential thermal phases with pneumatic compression applied to the affected upper limb, delivered with a specialized device in addition to standard therapy. The primary outcome measures were pain level and edema volume. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery, spasticity, clinical motor recovery, and neuropathic pain assessments. This study aims to contribute new evidence about whether contrast compression therapy offers additional benefits for managing post-stroke CRPS.\*

Detailed description

Post-stroke complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), also known as shoulder-hand syndrome, is observed in more than 50% of patients who have experienced a stroke. This condition is typically classified as Type I CRPS due to the absence of identifiable peripheral nerve injury. Although the precise underlying mechanism remains unclear, biomechanical factors that cause mechanical instability of the shoulder joint and repetitive microtrauma are considered major risk factors for its development. Clinically, post-stroke CRPS is characterized by severe pain involving both the shoulder and wrist, accompanied by symptoms such as edema, warmth, redness, limited range of motion, tenderness in the metacarpophalangeal joints, and in later stages, joint contractures that may cause significant functional impairment. The chronic nature of CRPS can lead to substantial limitations in upper extremity use, prolonged hospital stays, dependency in daily living activities, and increased overall rehabilitation costs, thereby reducing patients' quality of life. Although various conservative treatments-including pharmacological agents, physical therapy, contrast water therapy (CWT), and sympathetic nerve blocks-are frequently used, the effectiveness, long-term safety, and accessibility of standardized treatment protocols remain limited. Traditional contrast water therapy aims to stimulate circulation and modulate inflammation by alternating vasodilation and vasoconstriction phases; however, modern contrast compression therapy enhances this principle by combining sequential thermal stimulation with active pneumatic compression. This combination aims to improve not only peripheral circulation but also lymphatic drainage and tissue oxygenation. Contrast compression therapy has gained popularity in recent years, especially in orthopedic and sports rehabilitation, due to its potential benefits in controlling pain and edema. Technological advancements have enabled these systems to deliver precisely regulated temperature, pressure, and treatment durations, allowing for a more controlled and personalized approach compared to conventional methods. Despite promising results in musculoskeletal applications, no clinical trial to date has specifically evaluated the effects of contrast compression therapy in the neurological rehabilitation context, particularly for patients with post-stroke CRPS. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial was designed to investigate whether adding contrast compression therapy to conventional rehabilitation provides additional benefits for pain control, edema reduction, functional recovery, and motor improvement in patients diagnosed with post-stroke CRPS, aiming to address an important gap in the current literature.

Interventions

PROCEDUREConventional Rehabilitation

A standard rehabilitation program including positioning, range of motion exercises, stretching, strengthening, and conventional transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

DEVICEContrast Compression Therapy

Contrast compression therapy using a Game Ready® MED4 ELITE device applied to the affected upper extremity with sequential hot and cold phases and pneumatic compression.

Sponsors

Meltem Gunes Akinci
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 25 and 80 years * First-ever stroke diagnosed within the previous 12 months * Diagnosis of upper-extremity complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS-I) according to the Budapest clinical criteria * Subacute-stage CRPS affecting the upper limb * Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 23 * Provided written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable medical condition * Hemispatial neglect * Sensory or motor aphasia * Shoulder subluxation * CRPS due to causes other than stroke * Bilateral CRPS-I * History of psychotic disorder * Coexisting neuropathic pain syndromes (e.g., diabetic neuropathy) * Presence of open wounds in the treatment area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pain IntensityBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentUpper extremity pain will be assessed at rest and during activity using the Visual Analog Scale.
Change in Upper Extremity Edema VolumeBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentEdema will be measured by the water displacement method using a hand volumeter.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Neuropathic Pain ProbabilityBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentNeuropathic pain probability will be assessed using the painDETECT Questionnaire.
Change in SpasticityBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentSpasticity will be measured using the Modified Ashworth Scale.
Change in Functional IndependenceBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentFunctional status will be assessed using the motor subscale of the Functional Independence Measure.
Change in Clinical Motor RecoveryBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatmentMotor recovery will be evaluated using the Brunnstrom Motor Recovery Stages for the upper extremity and hand.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026