Skip to content

Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality Counseling on Improving Shared Decision-Making in Thoracic Surgery

Effect of Mobile Augmented Reality Counseling on Improving Shared Decision-Making in Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07062393
Enrollment
47
Registered
2025-07-14
Start date
2022-07-15
Completion date
2023-06-19
Last updated
2025-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer Patients

Keywords

Shared decision making, Patient education, Augmented reality

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial evaluates the effectiveness of Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR) counseling compared to traditional verbal counseling for patients undergoing thoracic surgery. MAR counseling integrates patient-specific 3D anatomical models to enhance understanding of surgical procedures and risks. The study assesses patient and caregiver satisfaction, decision-making confidence, and communication quality. Health care providers' perspectives on the counseling methods are also examined. Participants will be assigned to one of the two counseling groups and asked to complete a questionnaire immediately after the counseling session.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTraditional Counseling → MAR Counseling

A single session begins with mobile augmented-reality counseling using interactive 3D models, followed by a standard verbal counseling with printed diagrams and CT images.

BEHAVIORALMAR Counseling → Traditional Counseling

A single session begins with mobile augmented-reality counseling using interactive 3D models, followed by a standard verbal counseling with printed diagrams and CT images.

Sponsors

Tri-Service General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study employs a 2-period, 2-sequence crossover design in which all participants receive both interventions (traditional counseling and mobile augmented reality \[MAR\] counseling) in different sequences. Participants are randomly assigned to either the traditional-then-MAR group (T-M group) or the MAR-then-traditional group (M-T group). This design allows within-subject comparison of counseling effectiveness, minimizing individual variability.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 20 years and older * Scheduled for elective thoracic surgery * Able to understand written and spoken Mandarin * Willing and able to provide informed consent * Capable of completing questionnaires independently or with minimal assistance

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency surgery cases * Severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric illness interfering with participation * Visual or hearing impairments that prevent interaction with mobile devices * Previous participation in a similar counseling trial * Inability to complete follow-up procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Shared decision-making scoreImmediately after counseling session (single timepoint)Shared decision-making was evaluated using a validated questionnaire assessing patient perceptions of decision support, preparedness, and engagement. The total score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores indicating better shared decision-making.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient counseling preferenceImmediately after both counseling sessionsParticipants indicated their preference for either traditional counseling or MAR-based counseling after experiencing both, using a structured post-intervention questionnaire. The results were reported as percentages per group.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026