Efficacy of Different Osseodensification Techniques

Evaluation Of Different Motor Driven Osseodensification Techniques Used For Implant Placement In Posteriorly Atrophied Mandible Of Osteoporotic Patients

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT07061015

Enrollment

Registered

2025-07-11

Start date

2023-03-01

Completion date

2025-01-15

Last updated

2025-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osseodensification

Brief summary

different possible osseodensification techniques used to improve bone density around dental implants, using either \] osseodensifying drills, reverse drilling of conventional drills, and rotary expanders.

Detailed description

the study include 3 groups with different implant drilling protocols; group 1 where osseodensifying burs are used, group 2 where conventional drills with reverse motion are used, group 3 where rotary expanders are used

Interventions

PROCEDUREosseodenification with osseodensifying burs

different osseodensification techniques to be studied

PROCEDUREreverse drilling

using the conventional drills in reverse mode

PROCEDURErotary expanders

expanders in clockwise direction

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

OTHER

Masking

NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

FEMALE

Age

45 Years to 60 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* · Adult osteoporotic female patients confirmed by CBCT grey values ranging from 290 to 420 HU, with age range 45-60 years. * Patients should be free from any other systemic diseases, according to ASA classifications (American society of Anesthesiologists). * Patients of single or multiple missing teeth in the posterior mandible. * A ridge width of 4mm and a height of \> 8mm above the roof of Inferior Alveolar canal. * No buccal concavities were present at the planned implant site

Exclusion criteria

* · Poor oral hygiene. * Heavy smoker (more than 20 cigarettes /day),or alcoholic abusing patients. * Radiation therapy to the head and neck region, or chemotherapy in the last 6 months prior to the implant placement.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
peri implant bone density	12 months	through ROI (region of interest) to measure Grey scale on Cone beam computed tomography CBCT
implant stability quotient	12 months	ISQ (implant stability quotient) using osstell device
alveolar ridge dimension changes	12 months	with cone beam computed tomography CBCT in coronal and sagittal cuts, in millimeters mm .

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026