Atrioventricular Nodal Ablation Versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation - Patient Centred Decisions

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

atrial fibrillation ablation, Pulmonary vein isolation, Physiological pacing, atrioventricular nodal ablation

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two procedural approaches to managing atrial fibrillation. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is AF ablation or pacemaker implant and AV nodal ablation a more effective treatment approach for patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to pharmacological treatment? What effect do these differing treatment approaches have on patient's quality of life and mental health? Participants will: Be randomly allocated to one of the treatment approaches. Visit the clinic 2 months, 12 months and 24 months after their procedure for a checkup, questionnaires and repeat heart ultrasounds.

The goal of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of pulmonary vein isolation compared with pacemaker implant and atrioventricular nodal ablation for patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients who have been refractory to attempts at symptom control with pharmacological therapy will be eligible and will be randomised to one of the two approaches. The primary outcome will be all cause rehospitalisation with secondary outcomes including procedural complications, echocardiographic measurements, patient reported outcomes, all cause mortality and rehospitalisation due to cardiovascular causes. These will be assessed over the 2 years following the index procedure. The patient reported outcome measures will be the EQ5D, AF Effect on Quality of life score (AFEQT), Hospital anxiety and depression score (HADS) and Somatosensory amplification scale.

No related papers found yet.