Skip to content

Unravelling The Optimisation And Consolidation Of Motor Skills In People With Multiple Sclerosis With Mild to Moderate Gait Impairment: A Feasibility Study

Unravelling The Optimisation And Consolidation Of Motor Skills In People With Multiple Sclerosis With Mild to Moderate Gait Impairment Via High Intensity Task Oriented Circuit Training: A Feasibility Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07058870
Acronym
UNLOCK MS MGI
Enrollment
18
Registered
2025-07-10
Start date
2024-10-15
Completion date
2026-02-28
Last updated
2025-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

high intensity training, multiple sclerosis, motor learning, mild to moderate multiple sclerosis

Brief summary

The goal of this feasibility study is to test the safety and effectiveness of an high-intensity task oriented circuit training program, followed by three months of telerehabilitation in people with mild to moderate Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The main questions it aims to answer are: * Can high-intensity task oriented circuit training improve gait and balance functional capacity? * Can telerehabilitation mantain the benefits in gait and balance gained via circuit training for a six month period? Participants will: * Complete 10 session ( one hour each, three times a week) of high-intensity task oriented circuit training administered in a hospital setting. The training will target key motor skills such as walking, stepping, supine to stand transitions and general mobility. * Engage in 3 months of asynchronous telerehabilitation (without physiotherapist supervision)

Interventions

Participants will receive 10 sessions of high-intensity, task-oriented circuit training, three times a week. Each session will last 60 minutes, with minutes of active training. Each session will include three rounds, each lasting 55 minutes. During each round, participants will rotate between stations working for four minutes at each station, followed by three minutes of rest. The stations will focus on key motor skills, including supine to stand transitions, walking speed and functional capacity, walking adaptability and stepping. After in-hospital treatment participants will receive 36 sessions of asynchronous telerehabilitation, three times a week for 12 weeks. This intervention will be supported by low-cost, off-the-shelf technology for treatment delivery and monitoring.

Sponsors

University Hospital of Ferrara
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of primary or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis according to the McDonald criteria. * Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \> 24. * Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≤ 6.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of other psychiatric or neurological disorders. * Cardiopulmonary, renal, or liver diseases. * Pregnancy. * Modifications in drug treatment within the last 3 months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in BalanceBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)The change in balance will be assessed using the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Dual task CostBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Dual Task Cost will be assessed by the difference between Timed Up and Go and Dual Task Timed Up and Go
Change in quantitative mobility and leg function performanceBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Leg function performance and quantitative mobility assessed through Timed 25 Foot Walk
Change in auditory information processing speed and flexibilityBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test will be used to assess auditory information processing speed and flexibility
Change in Walking SpeedBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)10 Meters Walking Test will be used to assess the change in walking speed
Change in ability to modify balance while walking in the presence of external demandsBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)The extended version of the Dynamic Gait Index will be used to assess ability to modify balance while walking in the presence of external demands
Change in dynamic balance during an activity requiring weight-shift and movement while in single-leg stanceBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Step Test will be used to assess the change in dynamic balance during an activity requiring weight-shift and movement while in single-leg stance
Change in Subjective Trait FatigueBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Change in subjective trait fatigue will be assessed through Modified Fatigue Impact Scale
Change in mobility, balance, walking ability, and fall riskBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Mobility, balance, walking ability, and fall risk will be assessed through Timed Up and Go Test
Change in functional lower extremity strengthBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Five Times Sit to Stand will be used to assess functional lower extremity strength
Change in Walking capacityBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Walking capacity will be assessed through the 6 Minute Walking Test
Change in impacts of multiple sclerosis in people' lifesBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)The impact of multiple sclerosis in people' lifes will be assessed through Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale 29.
Change in balance confidenceBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)Change in balance confidence will be assessed through Activity-Specific Balance Confidence Scale.
Change in perceieved impact of MS on the individual's walking ability.Baseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)The 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) will be used to measure of the impact of MS on the individual's walking ability.
Change in Walking FatigabilityBaseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)The Distance Walking Index will be used to assess the Change in Walking Fatigability
Change in ability to transition from a supine positon to a standing position.Baseline testing (T0), score changes after the 4 weeks in-hospital treatment (T1), score changes after the 3-months asynchronous telerehabilitation intervention (T1) and score changes at follow up, 3 months after telerehabilitation intervetion (T3)The Supine To Stand Test will be used to assess the ability to transition from a supine positon to a standing position.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactSofia Straudi, MD, PhD
sofia.straudi@unife.it+390532238720

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026