Skip to content

Muscle Energy Technique and Myofascial Chain Training for Menstrual Pain in Primary Dysmenorrhea (METPD-25)

Combined Muscle Energy Technique and Myofascial Chain Stabilization Reduces Menstrual Pain and Improves Pelvic Alignment in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07058480
Acronym
METPD-25
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-07-10
Start date
2024-12-15
Completion date
2025-03-31
Last updated
2025-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Dysmenorrhea (PD)

Keywords

Pelvic Girdle Dysfunction, Muscle Energy Technique, Pelvic Stabilization Training, Pelvic Alignment

Brief summary

This prospective clinical trial evaluates the effects of a non-pharmacological intervention combining muscle energy technique (MET) and myofascial chain (MFC)-based pelvic stabilization training in women with primary dysmenorrhea (PD). The study aims to determine whether this combined approach can improve pelvic alignment, reduce menstrual pain, and enhance static balance. Participants are assigned to either an experimental group receiving MET + MFC-based training or a control group receiving conventional physiotherapy. Outcomes include radiographic pelvic parameters, pain intensity, and balance performance.

Detailed description

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is a common gynecological condition characterized by cyclic lower abdominal pain without an identifiable organic cause. Biomechanical factors such as pelvic misalignment and myofascial imbalance are increasingly recognized as contributing to the persistence and severity of PD. This prospective non-randomized controlled trial investigates whether a combined intervention of muscle energy technique (MET) and myofascial chain (MFC)-based pelvic stabilization training can improve pelvic structure and reduce clinical symptoms in women with PD. Participants are women aged 18-45 years with moderate-to-severe PD and radiographic evidence of pelvic misalignment. They are assigned to one of two groups: Experimental group: MET plus MFC-based core stabilization exercises. Control group: Interferential current therapy and deep friction massage. Interventions are administered three times per week for four weeks. The primary outcomes include changes in pelvic sagittal parameters (pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence), pelvic symmetry, menstrual pain (measured by VAS), and static balance (eyes-closed single-leg stance). Assessments are conducted at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks post-intervention. The study aims to explore whether biomechanical correction of pelvic alignment contributes to pain modulation and functional improvement in women with PD, providing a basis for non-pharmacological rehabilitation strategies.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCombined MET and MFC-Based Pelvic Stabilization Training

This intervention consisted of a combination of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) for iliac and sacral dysfunctions (20 minutes per session) and myofascial chain-based pelvic stabilization training (including curl-ups, planks, and anti-rotation exercises; 30 minutes per session), targeting pelvic alignment and neuromuscular control. Sessions were conducted 3 times per week, 50 minutes per session, for 4 consecutive weeks.

DEVICEInterferential current therapy (ICT)

Interferential current therapy (ICT) was applied to the lumbar (lower back), sacroiliac, and iliac crest regions, 3 sessions per week, 20 minutes per session, for 4 weeks.

BEHAVIORALDeep Friction Massage (DFM)

Deep friction massage was administered to the lumbar, sacroiliac, and iliac crest regions for 30 minutes per session, 3 sessions per week, for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Shanjiao Luo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

This was an open-label study without any masked parties.

Intervention model description

This study adopted a prospective, two-arm parallel assignment design to compare the effects of MET combined with myofascial chain-based pelvic stabilization training versus conventional physiotherapy in women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Females aged 18-45 years * Regular menstrual cycles * Clinically diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea * Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score ≥ 4 during menstruation for at least six consecutive months * Radiographic evidence of pelvic tilt, sacral slope deviation, or frontal pelvic asymmetry

Exclusion criteria

* Secondary dysmenorrhea or diagnosed gynecological pathologies (e.g., endometriosis, ovarian cysts) * Pregnancy or lactation * Current use of hormonal contraceptives or hormone therapy * Ongoing or recent physical therapy targeting the pelvis * History of pelvic or spinal surgery * Congenital or structural musculoskeletal disorders affecting the lumbopelvic region

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in menstrual pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline (pre-intervention), Week 4 (immediate post-intervention), and Week 12 (telephone follow-up to assess sustainability of treatment effects)The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity before and after intervention, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS,0-10). Participants rated their average menstrual pain during the most painful day of menstruation. A reduction in VAS score indicated improvement in dysmenorrhea symptoms.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Pelvic Tilt (PT) AngleBaseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)Change in PT (degrees) from baseline to Week 4, assessed by standardized lateral pelvic radiograph.
Change in Sacral Slope (SS) AngleBaseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)Change in SS (degrees) from baseline to Week 4, assessed by standardized lateral pelvic radiograph.
Change in Pelvic Incidence (PI) AngleBaseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)Change in PI (degrees) from baseline to Week 4, assessed by standardized lateral pelvic radiograph.
Change in Pelvic Asymmetry ScoreBaseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)Change in pelvic asymmetry assessed by frontal pelvic X-rays from baseline to Week 4. Pelvic asymmetry is determined by a composite score based on iliac crest height discrepancy, anterior/posterior innominate rotation, adduction/abduction shift, and sacral torsion.
Change in Static BalanceBaseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)Change in single-leg stance time (seconds, eyes closed) from baseline to Week 4.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026