Skip to content

Simulation-Based Training for Epidural Analgesia Placement

Effectiveness of Simulation-Based Training for Epidural Analgesia Placement in Obstetric Settings: A Prospective, Randomized, Monocentric Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07056140
Enrollment
86
Registered
2025-07-09
Start date
2025-09-12
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2025-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epidural Analgesia, Medical Education, Obstetric Anesthesia

Keywords

Epidural analgesia, Obstetric anesthesia, Epidural catheter placement, Simulation training, Medical education, Obstetric simulation, Anesthesia training, Technical skills

Brief summary

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for labor pain management, widely recommended by the WHO and included in Italy's essential levels of care (LEA) since 2017. Despite its clinical benefits and high maternal satisfaction, the procedure remains technically challenging, particularly for anesthesia residents. In our institution, around 40% of laboring women request epidural analgesia. Successful epidural placement requires mastering a complex skillset. Recent studies highlight that simulation-based training significantly enhances learning for novice practitioners. This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate whether a pre-rotation simulator-based training improves the success rate of epidural catheter placement among anesthesia residents. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (simulation training plus anatomy lecture) or the control group (standard in vivo training only). The primary outcome is the number of successful catheter placements (defined as completed procedure without tutor intervention). Secondary outcomes include procedure time, complication rates, and satisfaction scores from the residents. The study will involve anesthesia residents in their 4th or 5th year rotating in the labor ward of the Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova. A sample size of 86 participants (43 per group) is required, and data collection will occur over three years.

Detailed description

Epidural analgesia remains the most effective method to relieve pain during labor. It acts on both visceral and somatic pain pathways and is particularly recommended in various maternal and fetal indications, such as twin pregnancies, induced labor, and high-risk maternal conditions (e.g., obesity, preeclampsia, diabetes). Despite its widespread use, epidural placement is technically demanding, especially in laboring women who are in pain, exhausted, and often overweight. This complexity is further compounded by the fact that fewer open surgeries are being performed in training settings, which limits residents' opportunities to practice epidural catheter placement under optimal conditions. Hence, the use of simulation-based training has become increasingly important. The aim of this study is to assess whether prior training with high-fidelity epidural simulators improves the technical success of novice anesthesia residents. Simulation sessions will utilize models already available at the teaching center (Kyoto Kagaku Lumbar Puncture and Epidural Anesthesia Simulators). This open-label, randomized, single-center interventional study will recruit anesthesia residents with less than 20 previous epidural placements. Residents will be allocated into two groups (simulation vs. control) and further stratified by experience level (novice \<20 vs. intermediate \>20 prior procedures). Those in the simulation group will receive a frontal anatomy lecture and a 3-hour practical session on simulators before their labor ward rotation. All procedures will be performed under supervision, and outcome assessors will complete structured CRFs for each attempt. Data will be pseudonymized and stored securely. Analyses will include both parametric and non-parametric tests, with a significance level of p \< 0.05. The trial complies with GCP standards and ethical guidelines, and informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

Interventions

PROCEDUREEpidural Simulation Training

The group will have access to a epidural simulator and would have possibility to freely experiment and improve their skill on the phantom before their residency period in the obstetric unit

Participants will receive a standard clinical training based on frontal lessons regarding indications , controindications to epidural analgesia and the technique will be explained also with the use of video material

Sponsors

University of Padova
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: a standard training group or an enhanced simulation-based training group for epidural placement. Each participant will receive only one type of intervention, with no crossover between groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Residents in Anesthesia * Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

* An experience of 20 or more epidural catheter positioning * Experience with epidural simulator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success Rate of Epidural Catheter PlacementImmediately following the procedure, up to 45 minutes after the enorllment.Defined as successful placement of the epidural catheter in the correct anatomical space as determined by supervising anesthesiologist.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Accidental Dural Puncture (Complication)During the procedure from the enrollment up to 45 minutes after the enorllmentNumber of procedures resulting in unintentional puncture of the dura mater.
Incidence of Bloody Tap (Complication)During the procedure, from the enrollment up to 45 minutes after the enorllmentOccurrence of blood in the epidural needle or catheter upon insertion.
Incidence of Supervisor interventionDuring the procedure, from the enrollment up to 45 minutes after the enorllmentThe procedure required the attending anesthesiologist intervention to be completed
Number of Attempts Required for Successful Placement of the Epidural CathterDuring the procedure, from the enrollment up to 45 minutes after the enorllmentTotal number of needle insertions until successful catheter placement is achieved.
Success Rate of Epidural Catheter Positioning During the Night ShiftDuring the procedure, from the enrollment up to 45 minutes after the enorllmentDefined as successful placement of epidural catheters positioned from 08:00 PM to 08:00 AM in the correct anatomical space as determined by supervising anesthesiologist
Time to Complete the Epidural Catheter PositioningFrom the start to the end of the procedure, from the enrollment up to 45 minutes after the enrollmentTime to complete the epidural catheter positioning from the skin disinfection to the needle removal
Success Rate of Epidural Catheter Positioning During the Day ShiftDuring the procedure, from the enrollment up to 45 minutes after the enorllmentDefined as successful placement of epidural catheters positioned from 08:00 AM to 08:00 PM in the correct anatomical space as determined by supervising anesthesiologist

Countries

Italy

Contacts

Primary ContactSabina Medical Doctor, Rizzi
sabina.rizzi@aopd.veneto.it+390498213090

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026