Skip to content

Study of Pain Perception Using Computer-Controlled Versus Conventional Local Anaesthesia in Children Undergoing Molar Extraction

Evaluation of Pain Perception Using Computer-Controlled Local Anaesthesia Delivery With Different Injection Speeds Versus Conventional Anaesthesia for Maxillary Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07056101
Acronym
CCLAD-Pain
Enrollment
76
Registered
2025-07-09
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2025-10-31
Last updated
2025-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Anesthesia, Dental Anesthesia Efficacy, Dental Anxiety, Dental Phobia

Keywords

GENI Device, Pain Perception, Local Anesthesia Technique, Articaine, Computer-Controlled Local Anesthesia, Dental Injections

Brief summary

This clinical trial aims to compare pain perception in children during dental procedures when using a computer-controlled local anesthesia device versus a traditional syringe. Children aged 6 to 8 years who need maxillary primary molar extraction will be randomly assigned to one of four groups: three groups using different speeds of the GENI computer-controlled device, and one group using a conventional syringe. The study will assess pain using facial expression scales and physiological measures such as heart rate. The goal is to find a more comfortable method for delivering anesthesia to pediatric dental patients.

Detailed description

This is a parallel-design randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating pain perception during local anesthesia administration in children undergoing extraction of maxillary primary molars. The study compares the use of a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system (GENI) at three different injection speeds-high, moderate, and low-with conventional syringe-based anesthesia. Children aged 6 to 8 years who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to one of four groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Standardized injection techniques will be applied in all groups. The primary outcome is subjective pain, assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes include objective behavioral pain assessments using the FLACC scale and physiological responses such as heart rate and oxygen saturation measured with a pulse oximeter. All procedures will be performed by a single trained operator. The assistant supervisor will monitor randomization and data collection. Although blinding of the operator and participants is not feasible due to the nature of the devices, outcome assessors and the statistician will remain blinded to group assignment to reduce bias. The study aims to identify whether the GENI device provides improved comfort, reduced pain, and greater cooperation among pediatric patients compared to traditional local anesthesia techniques. The results are expected to guide the development of better pain management strategies in pediatric dentistry.

Interventions

DEVICEA conventional dental syringe

The conventional dental syringe (C-K JECT) is a manual, metal aspirating syringe commonly used for local anesthesia administration in dental procedures. In this study, the device is used to perform buccal and intrapapillary infiltration using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Injections are delivered manually at a standardized rate by the principal investigator. This arm serves as the active comparator to evaluate differences in pain perception between traditional syringe injections and those delivered via a computer-controlled device.

DEVICEGENI High-Speed Injection

The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system that automates the injection process using pressure feedback to regulate flow. In this arm, the device is set to high-speed mode to deliver the anesthetic solution at the fastest available flow rate. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is performed using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The procedure is carried out by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. Pain perception is assessed following injection to evaluate the impact of delivery speed on patient experience.

DEVICEGENI Moderate-Speed Injection

The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system designed to regulate flow and pressure during injection using real-time feedback. In this arm, the device is set to moderate-speed mode, delivering anesthetic at an intermediate flow rate. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is performed using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injection is administered by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. This group is used to assess the impact of moderate-speed delivery on pain perception and physiological response in pediatric patients.

DEVICEGENI Low-Speed Injection

The GENI device is a computer-controlled local anesthesia delivery system that maintains precise control over injection pressure and flow. In this arm, the device is set to low-speed mode, delivering the anesthetic solution at the slowest available rate to minimize tissue pressure and potential discomfort. Buccal and intrapapillary infiltration is administered using 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. The injection is performed by the principal investigator using a standardized technique. This group evaluates whether low-speed delivery reduces pain perception and improves patient comfort compared to faster injection speeds and conventional methods.

Sponsors

Tarek MHD kher al saka amini
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to one of four parallel groups: three receiving local anesthesia using the GENI computer-controlled device at different injection speeds (high, moderate, or low), and one receiving anesthesia via conventional syringe. Each participant will receive only one intervention throughout the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 8 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged from 6 to 8 years old * Both sexes * Healthy children classified as ASA I * Children with maxillary primary molars indicated for extraction * No previous dental experience * Mentally capable of communication and following instructions * No acute dental pain

Exclusion criteria

* Uncooperative children or those with a behavioral management problem (Frankl rating 1 or 2) * Children with known allergies to the local anesthetic or dental materials used in the study * Children taking medications (e.g., antibiotics, analgesics) in the previous 48 hours that may alter pain perception * Children whose parents or legal guardians refuse to sign the informed consent form * Children experiencing acute dental pain

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wong-Baker Subjective Pain Perception During Local Anesthesia InjectionImmediately after local anesthesia injectionPain perception will be measured using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Each child will select the face that best represents their level of pain immediately following the injection. This scale is a validated tool for assessing subjective pain in pediatric patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Pain Perception During local anathesia Injection (FLACC Scale)During local anesthesia injection(Day 1)Objective pain will be assessed using the FLACC Scale during the local anathesia injection . An external evaluator will observe and score facial expression,leg movement,activity,crying,and consolability. Unit of measure : Score (0-10)
Heart rate Response to Local Anesthesia injectionBaseline (within 10 minutes before injection )and during injection (Day 1)Heart rate will be measured using a fingertip pulse oximeter to evaluate physiological stress response. Reading will be taken before injection (baseline) and during the injection. Unit of measure : Beats per minute (bpm)
Oxygen Saturation During Local Anesthesia injectionBaseline (within 10 minutes before injection ) and during injection (Day 1)Oxygen saturation (%) will be measured using a fingertip pulse oximeter at baseline and during the injection to assess any change in oxygen levels as a physiological response to stress or pain. Unit of measure : Percentage (%)

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contacttarek MHD kher alsaka amini, Master degree
alsakatarek42@gmail.com+201127255997

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026