Skip to content

Comparison of 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617

Comparison of 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617 in a Prostatectomy Model (LUTACT Trial)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07054346
Acronym
LUTACT
Enrollment
45
Registered
2025-07-08
Start date
2025-07-08
Completion date
2028-04-30
Last updated
2026-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

High-risk Prostate Cancer, Localized Prostate Carcinoma, Prostate Cancer, Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis), Very High Risk Prostate Carcinoma

Keywords

Radioligand Therapy

Brief summary

There is evidence that Actinium-225 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (225Ac-PSMA) has a potentially higher level of efficacy than 177 Lutetium Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (177Lu-PSMA) as a radioligand therapy. This single center, pilot study will compare differences in the mechanisms of actinium-225 and lutetium-177 radioligand therapies (RLT) in participants with high or very high risk localized or locoregional prostate cancer planning on undergoing a prostatectomy.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: 1. Compare the tumor absorbed dose between 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617. 2. Compare the immunologic priming of 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617 with controls in prostatectomy specimens. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: 1. Determine the safety and tolerability of neoadjuvant 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617 in participants with high or very high-risk prostate cancer planning to undergo radical prostatectomy. 2. Estimate PSA response for 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617 treatment. 3. Estimate the rate of pathologic response in participants treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: 1. Determine the relationship between percent cell necrosis and tumor absorbed dose for both 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617. 2. Compare the heterogeneity of cell necrosis for 177Lu-PSMA-617 and 225Ac-PSMA-617. 3. Compare messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression profiles of tumor treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617, 225Ac-PSMA-617, and controls. 4. Compare mRNA expression profiles of tumors in participants who achieve a PSA50 response and those that do not. 5. Compare mRNA expression profiles of tumors from archival tissue and at time of prostatectomy. 6. Compare the percent cell necrosis between participants receiving a single cycle of PSMA RLT versus participants receiving two cycles of PSMA RLT. 7. Compare the change in uptake on PSMA Positron Emission Tomography (PET) to PSA response and percent cell necrosis. 8. Descriptively evaluate cell necrosis at the tumor margins. 9. Evaluate changes in peripheral immune activation markers following radioligand therapy. 10. Compare the kidney absorbed dose (in Gray) between patients receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617 and those receiving 225Ac-PSMA-617, using post-treatment SPECT imaging acquired 7 days after administration of the first dose. 11. Evaluate feasibility of PET for imaging actinium-225. OUTLINE: Participants will be assigned to 1 of 2 cohorts to receive 177Lu-PSMA-617 or 225Ac-PSMA-617. Additional participants undergoing prostatectomy without RLT will be enrolled as a control group. Participants enrolled in the RLT cohorts will receive 1 to 2 cycles of PSMA radioligand therapy up to 6 weeks apart before a scheduled, non-investigational, prostatectomy four weeks after PSMA radioligand therapy. Participants receiving RLT will be followed up for a safety assessment 6 weeks after surgery and for up to 60 months after prostatectomy for long term follow-up. Participants in the prostatectomy only cohort will have safety and long-term follow-up performed as part of clinical care up to 24 months after surgery.

Interventions

DRUG177 Lutetium Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen 617

Given intravenously (IV) or intra-arterially (IA)

DRUGActinium-225 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen 617

Given IV or IA

PROCEDURENon-investigational, Prostatectomy

Undergo non-investigational surgical procedure to remove prostate.

PROCEDUREProstate Tissue Collection

Whole prostate tissue will be collected for correlative research at time of prostatectomy.

PROCEDUREBlood Sample Collection

Blood samples will be obtained for research purposes

Sponsors

Thomas Hope
Lead SponsorOTHER
Novartis
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years. 2. Histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma. 3. High-risk disease as defined as meeting 1 or more of the 3 following criteria: 1. Gleason score of 4+4 disease or higher, Or Gleason 4+3 with large cribriform component (defined as \>0.25 mm in short diameter) 2. Pelvic nodal metastases on PSMA PET. 3. Extracapsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion on MRI or PSMA PET. 4. No evidence of distant metastatic disease as determined by PSMA PET. Nodal disease at or below the iliac bifurcation (clinical stage N1) is allowed. 5. Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) in the primary tumor greater than 10 on PSMA PET using Gallium-68 (68Ga)-PSMA-11 or piflufolastat F 18 (18F-DCFPyL). \*Note: this applies to treatment cohorts only; there are no SUV requirements for tissue-only cohorts (Control Group). 6. Target tumor in the prostate measuring greater than 1.0 cm on MRI. 7. Willing to undergo prostatectomy with or without lymph node dissection, and candidate for prostatectomy as determined by urologic oncology. 8. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥ 60%), 9. Demonstrates adequate organ function as defined below: 1. Platelets ≥100,000/mcL, independent of transfusions or growth factors within 3 months of treatment start. 2. Hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL, independent of transfusions or growth factors within 3 months of treatment start. 3. Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ≥1,500/microliter (mcL). 4. Creatinine clearance Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 , calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation. 5. Albumin ≥2.5 g/dL. 6. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤3.0 x ULN. 7. Total bilirubin (TBIL) ≤2 x the institutional upper limit of normal (ULN). For participants with known Gilbert's Syndrome ≤3 x ULN is permitted. * Note: this applies to treatment cohorts only; there are no requirements for tissue-only cohorts (Control Group) 10. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. 11. Participants must provide consent to comply to recommended radioprotection precautions during study. 12. Participants must use adequate contraception and not donate sperm while on study drug and for at least 14 weeks after the last study treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. Diagnosed with other malignancies that are expected to alter life expectancy or may interfere with disease assessment. However, participants with a prior history of malignancy that has been adequately treated and who have been disease- free, treatment- free for more than 3 years prior to randomization, or participants with adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer are eligible. 2. Individuals with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment has the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen. 3. Concurrent and serious (as determined by the principal investigator) medical conditions, including, but not limited to New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure, history of congenital prolonged QT syndrome, uncontrolled infection, known active hepatitis B or C or other significant co-morbid conditions that in the opinion of the investigator would impair study participation or cooperation. 4. Has received prior prostate cancer therapy. a. Prior 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (e.g. finasteride, dutasteride) allowed if discontinued at least 3 weeks prior to treatment start. 5. Has participated in a study of an investigational therapeutic product and received study treatment or used an investigational device within four weeks of the first dose of treatment. 6. Prior external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to the prostate or prostate bed. 7. Dry mouth that impacts the eating of food (i.e., requiring fluids prior to eating) Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean of tumor absorbed dose (Cohorts 1 and 2)1 weekThe mean tumor absorbed dose on post-treatment SPECT imaging within 7 days of the first radioligand treatment (RLT) will be obtained by using MIM Software to measure absorbed dose and researchers will manually segment activity in the dominant prostate tumor while carefully excluding any activity within the bladder using a threshold of 5 Gray. Using this segmented volume, the mean dose within the tumor in Gray for each participant and standard deviation will be calculated and reported descriptively for Cohorts 1 and 2. A two-sample t-test comparing the dose between Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) model to compare the dose between different treatment/fractionation modalities within each cohort will be performed.
Rate of Cluster of differentiation 3 positive (CD3+) T cell infiltration1 day, at time of prostatectomyImmunohistochemistry will be performed using standard methods, and stained slides will be scanned using an automated microscope scanner. Five randomly selected fields (0.25 mm\^2) from each participant's primary tumor will be captured. Using color-specific algorithms, CD3+ cell counts will be determined, and the mean of each of the five quantified fields will be used. We will use a two-sample t-test or ANOVA model comparing the CD3+ cell counts between Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 with participants who have not undergone prostatectomy enrolled in the biospecimen protocol, respectively.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of participants with reported treatment-emergent adverse events (Cohorts 1 and 2)Up to 6 weeks after last PSMA RLT administrationThe proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events, as classified by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5 (NCI CTCAE v5.0) will be reported for participants receiving RLT.
Proportion of participants with perioperative complicationsUp to 6 weeks after prostatectomyThe Clavien-Dindo classification is a widely used system for grading and classifying surgical complications. The Proportion of participants with documented perioperative complications following prostatectomy per the Clavien-Dindo classification will be reported.
Median scores on the xerostomia-quality-of-life-scale (XeQoLS)Up to 12 months after prostatectomyThe XeQoLS questionnaire measures the effects of salivary gland dysfunction and xerostomia on the four major domains of oral health-related quality of life: physical, pain, personal, and social. The questionnaire consists of 15 items, each rated on a 0-to-4 point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating more severe symptom burden. Median scores for each domain and global score and interquartile ranges will be reported.
Proportion of participants with 50% decrease in level of prostate specific antigen (PSA50)Up to 8 weeksThe proportion of participants who achieve a greater than 50% decline from baseline PSA drawn prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1), up to the day of prostatectomy, will be descriptively reported along with 95% binomial confidence interval. It will be compared between the two treatment Cohorts using a Fischer's test.
Proportion of participants with complete pathologic response1 day, at time of prostatectomyUsing the prostatectomy specimen, a board certified pathologies will determine pathologic complete response for each participant at time of prostatectomy. The pathologic response to the treatment in the prostate will be evaluated by percentage (0%, \<10%, 10-25%, 50-75%, 75-100%) of viable tumor in the formalin-fixed paraffin embedded specimen. Complete pathologic response will be defined as no viable tumor (0%), and minimal residual disease will be defined as \<10% of viable tumor. The number of participants in Cohorts 1 and 2 with complete pathologic response or minimal residual disease will be counted and the number of participants between the two cohorts will be compared using a Fisher's exact test. The proportion of complete pathologic response and minimal residual disease will be descriptively reported along with 95% binomial confidence interval.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMaya Aslam
Maya.Aslam@ucsf.edu(415) 514-8987
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORThomas A Hope, MD

University of California, San Francisco

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 29, 2026