Skip to content

Microsurgery and Periodontal Healing

The Effect of Microsurgical Approach to Periodontal Flap Healing: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07054008
Enrollment
25
Registered
2025-07-08
Start date
2025-08-31
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Diseases

Keywords

Surgical flap treatment

Brief summary

Scientists do research to answer important questions which might help change or improve the way we do things in the future. The investigators know that using glasses with special attachments that provide magnification (dental loupes) for dental procedures results in better healing than not using magnification. This study will test if using a microscope, that gives much higher magnification, can result in even better healing than using dental loupes.

Detailed description

A two-arm split mouth randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of using an experimental microsurgical approach with a digital microscope (Group 1) or standard of care surgical approach with dental loupes (Group 2) on post-operative wound healing of two standardized vertical releasing incisions. The split mouth design will ensure that each patient serves as their own control. The hypothesis is that the wound closure technique in Group 1: Microsurgical approach with digital microscope will have improved periodontal flap vertical releasing incision wound healing as compared to the Group 2: Standard of Care surgical approach with dental loupes.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMicrosurgical approach with Digital Microscope

The incision will be sutured with the use of a digital microscope (30 X) (Group 1). The microsurgical approach is a research only procedure that may add time to the total surgical time (\< 6%).

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

A two-arm randomized controlled split-mouth trial. Subjects will be randomized only for the first (mesial) incision to Group 1 (microscope) or Group 2 (dental loupes). The second incision (distal) will receive the other treatment. Every patient will receive both treatments.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Ability of subject to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. 2. Males and females; Age 18 -89 years old 3. Require surgical flap treatment of periodontal disease 4. Either maxillary or mandibular arch 5. ASA I or II 6. Has consistent transportation for all clinical and study visits

Exclusion criteria

1. Pregnancy, or those planning to become pregnant 2. Diabetics with an HbA1c \>7.1 3. Not eligible for surgical periodontal therapy 4. Require vertical or horizontal hard tissue augmentation 5. Non-English speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early wound healing indexOne, two and three weeksAssessment of early soft tissue wound healing

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in time between proceduresEnd of surgical procedure at last suture placementThe time needed for suturing the incision with the digital microscope (Group 1) and with standard of care dental loupes (Group 2) will be documented immediately after placement of the last suture.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactAngela Palaiologou-Gallis, DDS
PalaiologouA@uthscsa.edu210-450-3715

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026