Skip to content

Efficacy of RME and Facemask Therapy for Class III Malocclusion

Enhanced Efficacy of Early Orthopedic Intervention With Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Facemask Protraction on Skeletal and Quality of Life Outcomes in Class III Malocclusion: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07053683
Enrollment
358
Registered
2025-07-08
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2025-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Skeletal Class III Malocclusion

Keywords

Palatal Expansion Technique, Extraoral Traction Appliances, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Cephalometry, Rapid Maxillary Expansion, Oral Health-Related Quality of Life

Brief summary

This multicenter randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy of Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME) combined with facemask (FM) protraction versus FM protraction alone in treating growing children with skeletal Class III malocclusion. The study aims to evaluate the differences in vertical skeletal changes and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) between the two treatments.

Detailed description

Skeletal Class III malocclusion is a challenging craniofacial anomaly, particularly prevalent in Asian populations. Early orthopedic intervention aims to correct the discrepancy and guide favorable growth. While facemask (FM) protraction is a standard treatment, its efficacy can be enhanced by Rapid Maxillary Expansion (RME), which is thought to disarticulate the circummaxillary sutures and facilitate a better orthopedic response. This prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial was designed to rigorously compare the combined RME+FM therapy against FM therapy alone. The study's primary objective was to assess the impact of these interventions on vertical skeletal dimensions, a key concern in Class III treatment. The secondary objective was to evaluate the patient-centered outcome of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). Eligible patients aged 7-12 were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. Cephalometric and OHRQoL data were collected at baseline and after 12 months of active treatment to determine if the combined approach offers superior clinical outcomes.

Interventions

DEVICECombined RME and Facemask Therapy

This intervention involves two components. First, a tooth-borne Hyrax-type rapid maxillary expander is banded to the maxillary first permanent and deciduous molars. The screw is activated twice daily until posterior crossbite is overcorrected. Second, immediately following expansion, a Petit-type facemask is used to apply orthopedic protraction forces to the maxilla.

DEVICEFacemask Therapy Alone

This intervention involves the use of a Petit-type facemask to apply orthopedic protraction forces (400-500g per side, 12-14 hours/day) to the maxilla. A removable mandibular occlusal splint (flat bite plane) is used concurrently to facilitate anterior crossbite correction.

Sponsors

Wuhan Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
7 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Skeletal Class III malocclusion (ANB angle ≤ 0°) with a Wits appraisal ≤ -2 mm. * Maxillary deficiency (SNA angle ≤ 80°). * Prepubertal stage of skeletal development (Cervical Vertebral Maturation Stage CS1-CS3). * Age between 7 and 12 years. * Anterior crossbite or edge-to-edge incisor relationship. * Angle Class III or end-on molar relationship. * No previous orthodontic treatment.

Exclusion criteria

* Functional Class III malocclusion with no centric relation-centric occlusion discrepancy. * Congenital craniofacial anomalies (e.g., cleft lip/palate). * Severe systemic diseases. * History of maxillofacial trauma.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Vertical Linear Cephalometric MeasurementsBaseline, 12 MonthsMeasured from standardized lateral cephalograms and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans. Key measurements include overbite (mm), maxillary molar vertical position (PP-Ms distance, mm), and maxillary anterior position (X-A distance, mm).
Change in Angular Cephalometric MeasurementsBaseline, 12 MonthsMeasured from standardized lateral cephalograms and CBCT scans. Key measurements include sagittal jaw relationship (ANB angle, degrees), mandibular plane angle (SN-MP, degrees), and palatal plane angle (SN-PP, degrees).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Dental Positional MeasurementsBaseline (T0) and 6-month follow-up (T1).Change in cephalometric measurements assessing the position and inclination of the incisors, including the UI-NA angle, UI-LI angle (upper to lower incisor angle), UI-NA distance (upper incisor protrusion), and LI-NB distance (lower incisor position). These are measured in degrees or millimeters as appropriate.
Change in Dental Cephalometric MeasurementsBaseline, 12 MonthsMeasured from lateral cephalograms to assess changes in the inclination of the maxillary and mandibular incisors.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026