Skip to content

Association of Microcirculation, Vexus Score and Femoral Vein Doppler in Patients on the ICU After Non-emergency Cardiac Surgery

Association of Microcirculation, Vexus Score and Femoral Vein Doppler in Patients on the ICU After Non-emergency Cardiac Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07052461
Acronym
VeMic
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-07-04
Start date
2026-04-14
Completion date
2027-09-30
Last updated
2026-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fluid Management, Haemodynamic Coherence, Microcirculatory Convection Capacity, Microcirculatory Diffusion, Postoperative Cardiac Surgery, Venous Congestion

Keywords

vexus score, femoral vein doppler, intensive care unit

Brief summary

The aim of the VeMic study is to explore if venous congestion is linked with microcirculatory impairment in elective cardiac surgery patients in the postoperative ICU stay.

Detailed description

Cardiac surgery is associated with a significant risk of postoperative complications, including organ dysfunction such as acute kidney injury (AKI). Traditionally, clinical management in the intensive care unit (ICU) has focused on monitoring macrocirculatory parameters-such as blood pressure, cardiac output, and central venous pressure (CVP)-to guide treatment. However, adequate systemic perfusion does not always translate into sufficient tissue oxygenation at the microcirculatory level. Microcirculation, which occurs in the smallest vessels such as capillaries, is where oxygen and nutrients are actually delivered to the cells. Impairment in microcirculatory function can occur even when macrocirculatory values appear normal, leading to what is known as loss of hemodynamic coherence. Despite growing evidence of the clinical importance of microcirculation, routine bedside assessment remains limited due to technical challenges and the lack of easily applicable tools. While elevated CVP and signs of venous congestion have been linked to worse outcomes such as AKI, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. CVP alone is an imperfect marker for venous stasis and does not reliably predict microcirculatory impairment. Newer ultrasound-based tools-such as the Vexus score and femoral vein Doppler (FVD)-are emerging as promising, non-invasive methods to assess venous congestion at the bedside. However, it is currently unclear whether these sonographic signs of venous congestion are actually associated with impaired microcirculatory function. This knowledge gap limits clinicians' ability to interpret ultrasound findings in the context of microvascular health and to make informed decisions about fluid management and organ perfusion. The VeMic study aims to investigate whether ultrasound-based indicators of venous congestion correlate with objectively measured microcirculatory impairment in patients admitted to the ICU after non-emergency cardiac surgery. By combining ultrasound assessments with advanced analysis of sublingual microcirculation using handheld vital microscopy and automated software, the study seeks to bridge the gap between macro- and microcirculatory monitoring. The findings may help determine whether these easily accessible ultrasound tools can be used to detect early signs of microvascular dysfunction and guide more targeted, physiology-based interventions in the postoperative setting.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Elective or urgent (need for definitive procedure during hospitalisation, but not emergency intervention) cardiac surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years * Pregnant women * Known severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate \<15 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or dialysis) * Renal or liver transplantation * Any known condition interfering with Doppler evaluation of the portal system (including known or suspected cirrhosis or portal vein thrombosis or huge abdominal emphysema). * Inability to consent to study * Emergency cardiac surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in red blood cell velocity: concested vs non-congested3 measurements:T0 prior surgery, T1 first post-operative day, T2 6 hours after T1Difference in red blood cell velocity (RBCv) between patients grouped as congested (Vexus score of 2 and 3) vs. non-congested (Vexus score of 0 and 1).
Difference in total vessel density: concested vs non-congested3 measurements:T0 prior surgery, T1 first post-operative day, T2 6 hours after T1Difference in total vessel density (TVD) between patients grouped as congested (Vexus score of 2 and 3) vs. non-congested (Vexus score of 0 and 1).
Difference in red blood cell velocity: physiologic femoral vein flow vs. pulsatile pattern3 measurements:T0 prior surgery, T1 first post-operative day, T2 6 hours after T1Difference in red blood cell velocity (RBCv) between patients with a physiologic femoral vein flow vs. pulsatile pattern
Difference in total vessel density between patients with a physiologic femoral vein flow vs. pulsatile pattern3 measurements:T0 prior surgery, T1 first post-operative day, T2 6 hours after T1Difference in total vessel density (TVD) between patients with a physiologic femoral vein flow vs. pulsatile pattern

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in RBCv between patients with different Vexus scores3 measurements:T0 prior surgery, T1 first post-operative day, T2 6 hours after T1Difference in RBCv between patients with a Vexus score of 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 vs. 3
Difference inTVD between patients with different Vexus scores3 measurements:T0 prior surgery, T1 first post-operative day, T2 6 hours after T1Difference inTVD between patients with a Vexus score of 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 vs. 3
Difference in microcirculatory reserve capacity: congested non-congested3 measurements:T0 prior surgery, T1 first post-operative day, T2 6 hours after T1Difference in microcirculatory reserve capacity between patients grouped as congested (Vexus score of 2 and 3) vs. non-congested (Vexus score of 0 and 1)
Difference in microcirculatory reserve capacity: physiologic femoral vein flow vs. pulsatile patern3 measurements:T0 prior surgery, T1 first post-operative day, T2 6 hours after T1Difference in microcirculatory reserve capacity between patients with a physiologic femoral vein flow vs. pulsatile patern

Countries

Switzerland

Contacts

CONTACTGregor Loosen,, MD
gregormichael.loosen@usb.ch+41 61 328 40 90
STUDY_CHAIRMartin Siegemund, Prof. MD

University Hospital of Basel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 26, 2026