Skip to content

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy for Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Versus Conventional Fluid Therapy for Thoracoscopic Lobectomy in the ERAS Era: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07050979
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-07-03
Start date
2024-06-01
Completion date
2025-01-25
Last updated
2025-07-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Thoracoscopic Lobectomy, Thoracic Anesthesia, Enhanced Recovery After Anesthesia, Lung Cancer

Keywords

Goal directed fluid therapy, Enhanced Recovery After Anesthesia, Pressure Recording Analytical Method, Stroke volume variation, Cardiac index

Brief summary

The investigators aimed to examine the effect of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) compared to conventional fluid therapy in thoracoscopic lobectomy surgery with ERAS protocol on intraoperative pulmonary oxygenation and 30-day patient outcomes including postoperative morbidity and mortality. The primary outcome measure of the study was the PaO2/FiO2 ratio (change in pulmonary oxygenation) during one-lung ventilation, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity, quality of recovery, 30-day re-admission, and mortality rate. This randomized controlled study analyzed 80 adult patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy surgery with the ERAS protocol. In addition to standard monitoring in the operating room, all participants underwent Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) monitoring with the help of intra-arterial pressure monitoring method. Participants were randomly assigned to GDFT and conventional fluid therapy groups. In the GDFT group, fluid, inotropic agent and/or vasopressor therapy was administered by targeting stroke volume variation (SVV) and cardiac index (CI). In the control group, fluid and/or vasopressor therapy was administered with the guidance of MAP 65-95 mmHg and urine output at least 0.5 mL/kg/hr. Intraoperative hemodynamic data, amount and types of fluid administered, inotropic and vasopressor agents were recorded. Vital signs, pulmonary, cardiac and other system morbidity, quality of recovery on days 1, 3 and 5 in the postoperative care unit and in the ward, and re-admission to hospital and mortality within 30 days were recorded.

Interventions

This arm administers fluid and vasopressor therapy based on SVV (less than 15%) and CI (\>2.6 L/min/m²) targets using the Pressure Recording Analytical Method (PRAM) system with the help of intra-arterial pressure monitoring method. Basal fluid replacement is provided with 5 mL/kg/hr of Lactated Ringer's solution.

This arm administers fluid and vasopressor therapy based on targets of Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) 65-95 mmHg and hourly urine output minimum of 0.5 mL/kg/hr. Basal fluid replacement is provided with 5 mL/kg/hr of Lactated Ringer's solution.

Sponsors

Cukurova University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The anesthesiologist responsible for intraoperative management was aware of the group assignments, but other members of the research team, other healthcare providers, and patients were unaware. Confidentiality of randomization to the investigators was maintained until the end of the study for statistical data analysis.

Intervention model description

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized into the intervention (goal directed fluid therapy - group GDFT, n=40) or control (conventional fluid therapy - control group, n=40) groups using opaque sealed envelopes.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-65 years. * ASA Physical Status Classification I-II. * Undergoing elective thoracoscopic lobectomy with the ERAS protocol. * Provided informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 or \> 65 years. * ASA Physical Status Classification III or higher. * Patients not in sinus rhythm, and with recent oral beta-blocker use. * Patients with cardiac/renal/hepatic insufficiency, valvular heart disease (aortic or mitral valve insufficiency or stenosis) * Patients with abnormal preoperative lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 50% of predicted values) * Patients with severe obesity (BMI\>35 kg/m2) * Patients who cannot be applied to the ERAS protocol * Emergency surgery. * Refusal to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in PaO2/FiO2 Ratio During One-Lung VentilationIntraoperative period (from anesthesia induction to extubation).Measurement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio at five time points intraoperatively to assess pulmonary oxygenation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Cardiac ComplicationsUp to postoperative day 5.Incidence of cardiac complications (e.g., hypotension, hypertension, dysrhythmia).
Postoperative Renal ComplicationsUp to postoperative day 5.Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI).
Postoperative Infectious ComplicationsUp to postoperative day 5.Incidence of infections (e.g., pneumonia, surgical site infection).
Postoperative Pulmonary ComplicationsUp to postoperative day 5.Incidence of pulmonary complications (e.g., pulmonary edema, atelectasis, acute lung injury) assessed using chest X-ray and clinical evaluation.
Length of Hospital StayFrom date of surgery until the date of discharge.Duration of hospital stay in days.
30-Day Hospital Readmission RateFrom date of discharge until the postoperative 30th day.Rate of hospital readmissions within 30 days post-surgery.
Mortality RatePostoperative 30th day.Incidence of mortality within 30 days post-surgery.
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15 Score)Postoperative 24th hour.Patient-reported recovery quality assessed using the QoR-15 scale.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026