Skip to content

Mulligan Mobilization & Stretching Effects of Cervical

Effects of Mulligan Mobilization and Stretching on Cervical Radiculopathy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07045974
Enrollment
30
Registered
2025-07-01
Start date
2025-07-15
Completion date
2026-12-30
Last updated
2026-02-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Radiculopathy

Keywords

Pain, Disability Level, Range of Motion

Brief summary

1. To evaluate the effectiveness of mulligan mobilization and stretching exercises in reducing pain in individuals with cervical radiculopathy. 2. To evaluate the effectiveness of mulligan mobilization and stretching exercises in reducing disability in individuals with cervical radiculopathy. 3. To evaluate the effectiveness of mulligan mobilization and stretching exercises at improving ranges in individuals with cervical radiculopathy.

Detailed description

Cervical Radiculopathy is a condition characterized by dysfunction of cervical spinal nerve roots which occurs as a result of compression or inflammatory pathology from a space occupying lesion such as a disc herniation, decreased disc height and degenerative changes of the uncovertebral joints anteriorly and zygoapophyseal joints posteriorly. Cervical radiculopathy constitutes 5%-36% of all radiculopathies. In general, rate of occurrence of cervical radiculopathy is 83/100,000 with an increased prevalence in the fifth decade of life (203/100,000).

Interventions

OTHERGroup A-Mulligan Mobilization

Group A will receive Mulligan mobilizations (SNAGs). Mulligan SNAGs mobilization technique was applied at level C4/5. Subjects were placed in sitting position and therapist stood behind the patient with therapist's thumbs on spinous process of particular vertebra. Mobilization was given by active movement followed by passive overpressure based on the movement restricted. The duration of treatment was three sets of ten repetitions each. Conventional treatment include the following: Subjects in both the groups were treated with hot pack (20 min), TENS (2 to 10 Hz), and manual traction along with deep neck flexor, and isometric neck strengthening.

OTHERGroup B-Stretching Exercises

Group B will receive stretching exercises. Subject was asked to lie supine on the plinth and the head was held at the edge of the plinth by the therapist. Then with one hand the therapist held the neck in cervical lateral flexion to the opposite side so as to achieve the stretching of the trapezius muscle. Myofascial release by applying sustained finger pressure for 5-10 s on the involved trapezius was given. A gentle myofascial stretching force was applied to take up slack and sustained until a release occurred. This protocol comprised four sets of 15 stretches with 3 min rest. Conventional treatment include the following: Subjects in both the groups were treated with hot pack (20 min), TENS (2 to 10 Hz), manual traction along with deep neck flexor, and isometric neck strengthening.

Sponsors

Riphah International University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants falling in this category would be recruited into the study. * Both genders * Age between 20-50 years * Subjects with neck pain radiating down to the arm * Patients with positive findings for spurling test, Upper Limb Tension Test (ULTT), cervical distraction test and cervical rotation test towards the symptomatic side * Subjects who were willing to participate in the study and willing to take treatment for cervical radiculopathy.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant failing to fall in this category would be excluded of the study. * Systemic disease potentially affecting the musculoskeletal system Patients experiencing primary shoulder or upper extremity problem of local origin * Patients with any cardiovascular disorders and respiratory disorders * Patients with any other pathological conditions involving cervical spine like vertebro basilar insufficiency and canal stenosis * Patients having osteophytes in cervical vertebrae * Patients who were undergoing treatment for neck pain with other means of physiotherapy at the time of the study * Hypermobile joints of cervical vertebrae, Cervical fractures, spinal surgery or other spinal pathologies (i.e. ankylosing spondylitis, spondylolysthesis) * Peripheral nerve lesions like neurotemesis and axonotemesis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cervical Pain Intensity Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)4 WeeksThe NPRS is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable") High test-retest reliability has been observed in both literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis (r = 0.96 and 0.95, respectively) before and after medical consultation.
Cervical Range of Motion by Inclinometer4 WeeksAn inclinometer is a device used to measure angles. It is commonly used in physiotherapy to measure the range of motion (ROM) of joints and very similar to a goniometer. The digital inclinometer demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC=0.75-0.86), except for the right lateral flexion (ICC=0.74) and left rotation (ICC=0.72).
Cervical Disability by Neck Disability Index (NDI)4 WeeksThis questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how your neck pain has affected your ability to manage in everyday life. Score: /50 Transform to percentage score x 100 = %points. It has 7 items for daily living, 2 for pain and 1 for concentration. Each item is rated from 0 to 5. Total score is presented in percentage. Higher score tells greater disability while 0 means no disability(16).Total score is 50. In cervical radiculopathy patients it has moderate test retest reliability ICC= 0.68 (22).The NDI has a fair to moderate test-retest reliability in patients with mechanical neck pain but also for patients with cervical radiculopathy. The NDI has a good construct validity.

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

CONTACTAyesha Sadiq, MSPT (OMPT)
ayesha.sadiq@riphah.edu.pk03346257484
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAyesha Sadiq, MSPT (OMPT)

Riphah International University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 27, 2026