Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of Mesotherapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis

Comparison of the Efficacy of Mesotherapy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients With Lateral Epicondylitis: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07043335
Enrollment
50
Registered
2025-06-29
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2026-02-20
Last updated
2026-02-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Epicondylitis, Tennis Elbow

Keywords

elbow pain, mesotherapy, lateral epicondylitis, extracorporeal shock wave therapy

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy of mesotherapy in patients with lateral epicondylitis and to determine whether it is as effective as extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). Is mesotherapy an effective method in patients with lateral epicondylitis? Researchers will compare Mesotherapy to extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in patient with Lateral epicondylitis. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the Mesotherapy group or the ESWT group using a closed envelope method. * Group 1 (Mesotherapy group): Patients will receive a total of 5 sessions of mesotherapy, with one session every 7 days. * Group 2 (ESWT group): Patients will receive a total of 5 sessions of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT), with one session every 7 days. Patients will be assessed at three time points: before treatment, 30 minutes after the completion of the treatment, and 12 weeks after the completion of the treatment

Detailed description

This randomised-controlled single-blind prospective study was carried out at a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation out-patient clinic. After approval by the Ethics Committee, all participants signed a written informed consent form. The research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Participants The study will include individuals with lateral epicondylitis who are between the ages of 18 and 65 and have had elbow pain for at six weeks. Pain around the lateral epicondyle during resisted extension of wrist and fingers and tenderness over the lateral epicondyle were required for the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis. Patients with the following exclusion criteria were not accepted into the study: * Receiving an interventional injection in the elbow region within the last 3 months * Receiving physical therapy in the last 3 months * Receiving regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment in the last 2 weeks * History of fracture or surgery in the affected elbow region * Chronic inflammatory diseases * Acute infection * History of malignancy * Coagulation disorders * Pregnancy * Presence of a pacemaker or electronic implants * Cervical radiculopathy and entrapment neuropathy * Drug allergies * BMI \> 35 Demographic informations were recorded. Severity of elbow pain in activity were recorded according to Visual analogue Scale (VAS). Functional impairment were evaluated with The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation , Short-Form-Health-Survey-12 (SF-12 ) Following clinical assessment, patients were divided into two treatment groups randomly. Mesotherapy and Extracorporeal Shock wave Therapy . Exercise and resting wrist splints were recommended for all groups. The first group received mesotherapy: For this group, a solution containing 1 cc each of lidocaine, pentoxifylline, thiocolchicoside, and meloxicam diluted ¼ with saline will be made. A 30 gauge, 4 mm mesotherapy injector will be used for the application. The lateral epicondyle will be the site of an intradermal injection. Of that amount, 2.5 cc will be applied point-by-point at intervals of 1-2 cm, and the remaining 2.5 cc will be applied using the napage method, 0.1 cc of solution were given with each injection. Group 2 received Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy will be applied to the lateral epicondyle area at 10-15 Hz frequency, 1.5-2.5 bar energy density, and 2000 pulses. Patients will receive a total of 5 sessions of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT), with one session every 7 days. All measures were conducted at baseline, after treatment, at 12 weeks follow-ups.

Interventions

DEVICEExtracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy

For patients in Group 2, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy will be applied to the lateral epicondyle area at 10-15 Hz frequency, 1.5-2.5 bar energy density, and 2000 pulses. Patients will receive a total of 5 sessions of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT), with one session every 7 days.

PROCEDUREMesotherapy

Intradermal mesotherapy involving lidocaine, pentoxifylline, meloxicam, and thiocolchicoside will be applied to painful elbow points using a 4 mm, 30G needle in a point-by-point technique at a 90° angle (0.1 cc per point). A nappage technique at a 45° angle will then be applied around the common extensor tendon. A total of five sessions will be administered, one every 7 days.

Sponsors

Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged between 18 and 65 years * Pain and tenderness in the unilateral lateral epicondyle for ≥6 weeks * Clinically diagnosed with Lateral Epicondylitis * Patients without cognitive deficits who can follow verbal instructions

Exclusion criteria

* Receiving an interventional injection in the elbow region within the last 3 months * Receiving physical therapy in the last 3 months * Receiving regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment in the last 2 weeks * History of fracture or surgery in the affected elbow region * Chronic inflammatory diseases * Acute infection * History of malignancy * Coagulation disorders * Pregnancy * Presence of a pacemaker or electronic implants * Cervical radiculopathy and entrapment neuropathy * Drug allergies * BMI \> 35

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VASAll measures were conducted at baseline, at the end of treatment (Week 5), at 12th weeks follow-upMeasurement of pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10 cm line with endpoints representing 0 ("no pain") and 10 ("pain as bad as it could possibly be"). Minimum score: 0 Maximum score: 10 Higher scores indicate worse pain.
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow EvaluationAll measures were conducted at baseline, At the end of treatment (Week 5), at 12th weeks follow-upsThe Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) is a 15-item questionnaire designed to measure forearm pain and disability in patients with lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater pain and disability.
SF-12 Health SurveyAll measures were conducted at baseline,At the end of treatment (Week 5) , 12th weeks follow-upsA self-reported measure assessing health-related quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Algometer Measurement of Pressure-Pain ThresholdAll measures were conducted at baseline,At the end of treatment (Week 5) , at 12th weeks follow-ups.Measurement of pressure-pain threshold using an algometer device. Values are measured in kilopascals (kPa). Higher values indicate higher pain tolerance.
Hand Dynamometer for Grip StrengthAll measures were conducted at baseline,At the end of treatment (Week 5) , at 12th weeks follow-ups.Measurement of grip strength using a hand dynamometer. Values are measured in kilograms (kg). Higher values indicate stronger grip strength.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTBerna Gunay, Medical doctor
bernagunay@yahoo.com+905354133047

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026