Skip to content

Effectiveness of Blue Light for Hard-to-heal Wounds

Effectiveness of an Accelerated Photobiomodulation Protocol With Blue Light in Patients With Hard-to-heal Wounds: a Single-arm Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07042659
Enrollment
11
Registered
2025-06-29
Start date
2024-11-01
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2025-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Wounds, Hard-to-heal Wounds, Photobiomodulation Therapy, Wound Healing Delayed

Brief summary

Hard-to-heal wounds-those that fail to heal despite appropriate treatment-are a growing clinical challenge, often leading to significant discomfort, reduced quality of life, and high healthcare costs. These wounds are common among older adults and individuals with chronic conditions such as venous disease, diabetes, and lymphatic disorders. Photobiomodulation, a non-invasive therapy that uses specific wavelengths of light to stimulate biological processes, has shown promise in promoting wound healing. However, its effectiveness for long-standing, treatment-resistant wounds is not yet well established. This pilot study aims to evaluate the effects of an accelerated photobiomodulation protocol using blue light in patients with hard-to-heal wounds. The study takes place in nurse-led outpatient wound care clinics within the local health authority of Turin (ASL Città di Torino, Italy), which serves a diverse urban population. Eligible patients are adults with venous, diabetic, lymphatic, or mixed etiology wounds that have remained unhealed for at least two years. Participants receive blue light photobiomodulation treatment twice weekly for four weeks, in addition to standard wound care. Each session includes direct application of blue light to the wound area, following appropriate wound bed preparation and dressing changes. The primary outcome is the reduction in wound size, measured at baseline, at the end of treatment (week 4), and at a follow-up visit (week 12). Secondary outcomes include changes in pain levels, wound exudate characteristics, and the condition of surrounding skin. Adverse events are monitored throughout the study. By testing a standardized and replicable treatment protocol, this study seeks to generate preliminary evidence on whether blue light photobiomodulation can safely and effectively enhance healing in this complex patient population. Results may inform future clinical guidelines and support the integration of photobiomodulation into routine wound care pathways.

Interventions

DEVICEPhotobiomodulation

Accelerated photobiomodulation therapy using EmoLED™, a portable blue LED device (415 nm, 120 mW/cm², 7.2 J/cm²). The device delivers continuous blue light at 4 cm from the wound surface, 60 seconds per 25 cm² sub-area (120 seconds for diabetic wounds), administered twice weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. The protocol is combined with standard wound care (cleansing, dressings, compression as indicated). The intervention is designed to promote wound healing in hard-to-heal wounds by modulating inflammation, enhancing angiogenesis, fibroblast activation, and re-epithelialization. This accelerated protocol (twice weekly vs. standard weekly regimens) aims to optimize clinical outcomes in a nurse-led outpatient setting and distinguishes this intervention from lower-frequency or red/infrared-based photobiomodulation approaches.

Sponsors

University of Turin, Italy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged ≥ 18 years; * Presence of at least one hard-to-heal wound (defined as a wound unhealed despite treatment for ≥ 2 years); * Wound etiology of venous, lymphatic, diabetic, or mixed origin (venous/lymphatic/arterial documented); * Wound suitable for photobiomodulation treatment according to clinical evaluation; * Ability to provide written informed consent; * Willingness and ability to comply with the study protocol and attend scheduled visits.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years; * Active oncological disease; * Wound of exclusively arterial etiology; * Wound with active infection at the time of enrollment; * Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 3 months; * Any medical or psychological condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would interfere with study participation or pose an unacceptable risk.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound Area ChangeBaseline, Week 4 (end of treatment), Week 12 (follow-up)The primary outcome is the change in wound area (cm²) from baseline to week 12. Wound area is measured using CutiMed® Wound Navigator, a validated digital tool for wound assessment. The wound is photographed and measured at three timepoints: baseline, week 4 (end of photobiomodulation treatment), and week 12 (follow-up). The change in area is calculated as both absolute change (in cm²) and percentage change from the baseline. The outcome will assess the effectiveness of the accelerated photobiomodulation protocol in promoting long-term wound healing in patients with hard-to-heal wounds.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain ChangeBaseline, Week 4 (end of treatment), Week 12 (follow-up)Pain intensity reported by participants using a 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). Pain is assessed at each treatment session, at the end of photobiomodulation treatment (week 4), and at week 12 follow-up. Change in pain score over time will be analyzed.
Change in Wound Exudate QuantityBaseline, Week 4 (end of treatment), Week 12 (follow-up)Wound exudate quantity is assessed by nurses using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = absent; 1 = scarce; 2 = moderate; 3 = abundant). Assessed at each treatment session, at week 4, and at week 12 follow-up to monitor wound response to treatment.
Change in Wound Exudate QualityBaseline, Week 4 (end of treatment), Week 12 (follow-up)Wound exudate quality is assessed by nurses using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = clear; 1 = slightly bloody; 2 = bloody; 3 = purulent). Assessed at each treatment session, at week 4, and at week 12 follow-up to evaluate wound progression and infection status.
Change in Surrounding Skin ConditionBaseline, Week 4 (end of treatment), Week 12 (follow-up)Condition of skin surrounding the wound is assessed by nurses using a 4-point Likert scale (0 = healthy pink; 1 = slightly reddened; 2 = reddened; 3 = inflamed). Assessed at each treatment session, at week 4, and at week 12 to monitor local inflammation and skin integrity.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026