Skip to content

Rhomboid Intercostal Block With Sub-Serratus Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Block

Analgesic Efficacy of Rhomboid Intercostal Block With Sub-Serratus Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Block in Breast Cancer Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07041762
Acronym
RISS-ESPB
Enrollment
80
Registered
2025-06-27
Start date
2025-06-01
Completion date
2026-08-08
Last updated
2026-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer Patients

Keywords

erector spinae block

Brief summary

This study compares two nerve block techniques-Rhomboid Intercostal with Sub-Serratus Plane Block versus Erector Spinae Plane Block-for pain relief after breast cancer surgery. It aims to determine which method provides better postoperative pain control, reduces opioid use, and improves recovery in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of two ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques-Rhomboid Intercostal Block with Sub-Serratus Plane Block (RIB + SSP) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESB)-in patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer. Eighty female patients aged 18-65 years with ASA physical status II or III will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either RIB + SSP or ESB prior to surgery. Both blocks will be performed under ultrasound guidance 30-45 minutes before induction of general anesthesia. The primary outcomes are postoperative pain scores measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and total opioid consumption in the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic parameters, time to first analgesic request, total intraoperative opioid use, recovery time, patient satisfaction, and incidence of adverse effects such as nausea and vomiting. The study will be conducted at the National Cancer Institute - Cairo University from June 2025 to June 2026. Ethical approval will be obtained, and written informed consent will be collected. This study aims to identify the more effective and safer regional technique to improve postoperative recovery and reduce opioid dependence in breast cancer patients.

Interventions

PROCEDURERhomboid Intercostal Block with Sub-Serratus Plane Block

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia combining two injections: Rhomboid Intercostal Block (15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine injected between rhomboid major and intercostal space) Sub-Serratus Plane Block (15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine injected between serratus anterior and ribs). Both performed 30-45 minutes before Modified Radical Mastectomy under general anesthesia.

PROCEDUREErector Spinae Plane Block

Ultrasound-guided regional block with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine injected into the paraspinal plane at the T4-T5 level, between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes. Performed 30-45 minutes prior to general anesthesia for Modified Radical Mastectomy.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Regional blocks were performed by an experienced anesthesiologist who was not involved in postoperative care. Patients, nurses, and anesthesiologists responsible for postoperative data collection were strictly blinded to group allocations.

Intervention model description

observer-blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female breast cancer patients undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) ASA physical status II or III Age between 18 and 65 years Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 20 kg/m² and \< 35 kg/m²

Exclusion criteria

* Patient refusal ASA physical status IV Age \<18 years or \>65 years BMI \< 20 kg/m² or \> 35 kg/m² Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics or opioids History of psychological disorders or chronic pain Contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., coagulopathy, local infection, peripheral neuropathy) Severe respiratory, cardiac, hepatic, or renal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain ScoresFirst 24 hours postoperativelyPostoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) both at rest (static) and during movement (dynamic). Assessments will be conducted at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours following surgery. The VAS is a 10-centimeter scale, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates the "worst imaginable pain." Unit of Measure: VAS score (0-10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Opioid ConsumptionFirst 24 hours postoperativelyThe total amount of opioid analgesics administered within the first 24 postoperative hours will be recorded for each patient. All opioid dosages will be converted to intravenous morphine equivalents for standardization. Unit of Measure: Milligrams of intravenous morphine equivalents (mg)

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSayed Mahmoud M Abed, MD

National Cancer Institute - Cairo University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 26, 2026