Skip to content

Rhomboid Intercostal Block vs Erector Spinae Block

Assessing the Effectiveness of Rhomboid Intercostal and Erector Spinae Plane Blocks After Lung Cancer Thoracotomy

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07040618
Acronym
RIB-ESPB
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-06-27
Start date
2025-07-01
Completion date
2026-08-01
Last updated
2026-03-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This randomized trial compares rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for postoperative pain control in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy. Sixty patients will be assessed for 24-hour morphine consumption, pain scores, hemodynamics, recovery time, satisfaction, and side effects. The study aims to identify the more effective technique for enhancing recovery and minimizing opioid use.

Detailed description

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of two ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques-Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)-in female lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. Thoracotomy is known for causing severe postoperative pain, which, if not effectively managed, can lead to chronic pain and impaired pulmonary function. Traditional techniques like thoracic epidural or paravertebral blocks, while effective, have limitations due to technical complexity and potential complications. Recently, interfascial plane blocks such as ESPB have shown promise for thoracic analgesia, and RIB has emerged as a technique potentially offering superior lateral thoracic wall coverage. Sixty patients will be randomly assigned to receive either RIB or ESPB 30-45 minutes before surgery. The primary outcome is 24-hour postoperative morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes include visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, hemodynamic stability, time to first analgesic request, recovery duration, patient satisfaction, and incidence of nausea and vomiting. General anesthesia will be standardized across both groups. Data will be analyzed using appropriate statistical tests, and ethical approval will be obtained prior to patient enrollment. This study supports multimodal analgesia and aims to inform clinical practice in pain management after oncologic thoracic surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasound-guided Rhomboid Intercostal Block

This intervention involves an ultrasound-guided injection of 20-25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine into the fascial plane between the rhomboid major and intercostal muscles. The patient is positioned laterally, and the block is performed at the T5-T6 level using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe. The goal is to anesthetize the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves to provide postoperative thoracic analgesia.

This intervention consists of an ultrasound-guided injection of 20-25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine into the plane deep to the erector spinae muscle at the T4-T5 transverse process level. The patient is positioned sitting or in lateral decubitus, and the procedure uses a curved or linear ultrasound probe. This block targets the dorsal and ventral rami of thoracic spinal nerves to manage postoperative pain after thoracotomy.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

This is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of two ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques-Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)-in managing postoperative pain in lung cancer patients undergoing thoracotomy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung cancer Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 years ASA physical status II or III Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 20 kg/m² and \< 35 kg/m² Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Patient refusal ASA physical status IV Age \< 18 years or \> 65 years BMI \< 20 kg/m² or \> 35 kg/m² Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics or opioids used in the study History of chronic pain or psychological disorders Contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., local infection, coagulopathy, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy) Severe respiratory, cardiac, hepatic, or renal disease \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24-hour postoperative morphine consumptionWithin the first 24 hours postoperativelyThis outcome measures the total amount of morphine (in milligrams) administered to each patient within the first 24 hours after thoracotomy. Morphine will be given as rescue analgesia when the patient reports a visual analog scale (VAS) pain score of 4 or more. The cumulative dose will be recorded and compared between the Rhomboid Intercostal Block (RIB) and Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) groups to evaluate the relative effectiveness of each regional anesthesia technique in managing postoperative pain.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTSayed M Abed, MD
sayed.abed@nci.cu.edu.eg+20 122 680 6532
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSayed M Abed, MD

Associate Professor of Anesthesia and Pain Management, National Cancer Institute -- Cairo University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026