Assessment of Efficacy of Prebent Titanium Mesh Versus Customized Poly-ether Ether Ketone Mesh for Three Dimensional Augmentation in Deficient Maxillary Ridge. a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT07040124

Enrollment

Registered

2025-06-27

Start date

2020-10-01

Completion date

2025-02-01

Last updated

2025-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deficient Alveolar Bone

Keywords

augmentation,, peek, titanium mesh

Brief summary

In conclusion, the choice between titanium and PEEK meshes should consider patient-specific factors, clinical requirements, and surgeon expertise. The PEEK mesh, with its patient customized design enabled by CAD/CAM technology, offers significant advantages, including greater gained bone volume and reduced operative time. Its tailored fabrication ensures precise adaptation to the patient's anatomy, effectively maintaining the space required for optimal bone formation. The integration of such advanced technologies in regenerative procedures represents a significant step forward in achieving predictable outcomes and enhancing patient care. However, continued innovation and evaluation are crucial to refine these approaches and expand their applicability in oral rehabilitation

Interventions

PROCEDUREti mesh

prebent titamesh on a 3-d virtually augmented model

PROCEDURE3d peek mesh

milled 3d peek mesh

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 70 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Adult patient of both sexes presenting with partially edentulous maxillary ridge with horizontal bone defect. 2. The horizontal ridge dimension measured 2mm below the alveolar crest should range from 2-5 mm. 3. No local pathosis that may interfere with bone healing. 4. Good oral hygiene. 5. Age between 20-65 years old.

Exclusion criteria

* Patient taking any medication that may interfere with normal bone physiology or impair bone healing. 2. All patients suffering from any systemic disease that may affect bone healing. 3. Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarette per day) 4. Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism and clenching 5. Poor interest and cooperation from the patient. 6. Patients that have undergone any horizontal augmentation procedure at the site of interest

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
horizontal bone gain	6 months	cbct analysis for bone gain

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 17, 2026